期刊文献+

小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效分析 被引量:10

Analysis of the Clinical Effects of Small Incision Appendectomy on Acute Appendicitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析小切口阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床效果。方法:将2012年3月-2013年4月来我院治疗的74例急性阑尾炎患者随机分为实验组和对照组,对照组给予传统手术方式治疗,实验组给予小切口阑尾切除术治疗。结果:实验组患者的手术操作时间和术后恢复时间明显短于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者的术中出血量明显少于对照组(P<0.05);实验组患者的不良反应率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:对急性阑尾炎患者给予小切口阑尾切除术治疗,能够显著缩短手术操作、术后恢复时间,减少术中出血量,降低不良反应率,值得推广。 Objective To analysis the clinical effects of small incision appendectomy on acute appendicitis. Methods 74 cases of patients in our hospital from March 2012 to April 2013 with acute appendicitis patients were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, the control group was treated with traditional operation mode, the experimental group was given small incision appendectomy. Results The operation time and postoperative recovery time for experimental group was shorter than the control group (P 〈 0.05); the amount of bleeding in operation for experimental group was significantly less than that of the control group (P 〈 0.05); adverse reaction of patients in experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The small incision appendectomy on treating patients with acute appendicitis, can significantly shorten the recovery time of operation, postoperative, less bleeding, reduce the adverse reaction rate, worthy of promotion.
作者 李汶松
出处 《深圳中西医结合杂志》 2014年第5期62-63,共2页 Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
关键词 急性阑尾炎 阑尾切除术 手术方法 Acute appendicitis Appendectomy Surgical methods
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献17

  • 1Vahdad M R, Troebs R B, Nissen M, et al. Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis in children has complication rates comparable with those of open appendectomy[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2013, 48 ( 3 ) : 555-561.
  • 2Impellizzeri P, Simona A, Grasso M, et al. Surgical Stress after Open and Transumbilieal Laparoseopic-Assisted Appendectomy in Children[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2013, 1 ( 1 ) : 35.
  • 3Batajoo HHazra NK. Laparoseopie versus open appendectomy in acute appendicitis[J]. J Nepal Health Res Counc, 2012, 10 ( 22 ) : 239- 242.
  • 4Yaghoubian A, Kaji AHLee SL. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: outcomes analysis[J]. Am Surg, 2012, 78 (10) : 1083-1086.
  • 5Southgate E, Vousden N, Karthikesalingam A, et al. Laparoseopie vs open appendectomy in older patients[J]. Arch Surg, 2012, 147 ( 6 ) : 557-562.
  • 6Markides G, Subar DRiyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta- analysis[J]. World J Surg, 2010, 34 ( 9 ) : 2026-2040.
  • 7Saia M, Buja A, Baldovin T, et al. Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoseopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26 ( 8 ) : 2353-2359.
  • 8Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolieh MO, et al. Comparison of outcomes of laparoseopie versus open appendectomy in children: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample ( NIS ), 2006-2008[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36 (3) : 573-578.
  • 9Khan MN, Fayyad T, Cecil TD, et al. Laparoseopic versus open appendectomy : the risk of postoperative infectious complications[J]. JSLS, 2007, 11 ( 3 ) : 363-367.
  • 10Page AJ, Pollock JD, Perez S, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: an analysis of outcomes in 17, 199 patients using ACS/NSOIP[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2010, 14 ( 12 ) : 1955-1962.

同被引文献28

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部