期刊文献+

药物及个人护理品在土壤中的淋溶迁移性评价 被引量:9

Evaluation of Leachability of Pharmaceuticals and Personal Care Products in Soils
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了进一步明确药物及个人护理品(PPCPs)的环境风险,利用EPI Suite(4.11)软件计算了54种PPCPs在土壤中的半衰期(T1/2)、有机碳-水分配系数(Koc)、辛醇-水分配系数(Kow)和溶解度(S),并采用地下水污染指数(GUS)法评价了PPCPs在土壤中的淋溶迁移性。结果表明:54种PPCPs中,28种(占总数的52%)淋溶迁移性高,17种淋溶迁移性低,其余9种淋溶迁移性中等。对于所研究的PPCPs,其GUS与log Koc有较好的负相关性,这为评价PPCPs的淋溶迁移性提供了简易方法。说明淋溶迁移性主要受吸附作用的影响,且随着PPCPs吸附性的增强而降低。验证表明评价结果具有一定的合理性,也应综合考虑PPCPs浓度、气候条件、水文地质条件等因素对淋溶迁移性的影响,以更好地预测PPCPs对地下水的污染风险。 In order to further clarify the environmental risk of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs), the half- life (Tv2), organic carbon-water partition coefficient (Koc), octanol-water partition coefficient (Kow) and solubility(S) of 54 kinds of PPCPs were calculated with the software EPI Suite (4.11). According to the calculation results, leachability of these PPCPs was evaluated using the groundwater ubiquity score (GUS) method, and results show that among the 54 PPCPs, 28 has high leachability, accounting for 52% of the total, 17 has low leachability, and the other 9 has the middle leachability. There is a good negative correlation between the GUS and log Koc of PPCPs in this study, which can provide a simple method for leachability evaluation of PPCPs. And the leachability of PPCPs is mainly influenced by adsorption, higher adsorption results in lower leachability. The test and verification showed that the evaluation result is reliable. Besides, as to the evaluation of leachability of PPCPs, consideration of external influencing factors, such as the concentration of PPCPs, climatic conditions and hydrogeological conditions, is necessary for better prediction of groundwater pollution risk of PPCPs.
出处 《环境科学与技术》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期163-167,206,共6页 Environmental Science & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41172223) 环保公益性行业科研专项项目(201209053)
关键词 药物及个人护理品(PPCPs) EPI SUITE 地下水污染指数(GUS) 淋溶迁移性评价 pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) EPI Suite groundwater ubiquity score (GUS) evaluationof leachability
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

  • 1Daughton CG,Ternes TA.Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment:agents of subtle change[J].Environmental Health Perspectives,1999,107:907-938.
  • 2Lapworth DJ,Baran N,Stuart ME,et al.Emerging organic contaminants in groundwater:a review of sources,fate and occurrence[J].Environmental Pollution,2012,163:287-303.
  • 3Karnjanapiboonwong A,Suski JG,Shah AA,et al.Occurrence of PPCPs at a wastewater treatment plant and in soil and groundwater at a land application site[J].Water Air and Soil Pollution,2011,216(1/2/3/4):257-273.
  • 4Fick J,Soderstrom H,Lindberg RH,et al.Contamination of surface,ground and drinking water from pharmaceutical production[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2009,28(12):2522-2527.
  • 5Xu J,Chen W,Wu L,et al.Leachability of some emerging contaminants in reclaimed municipal wastewater-irrigated turf grass fields[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2009,28(9):1842-1850.
  • 6Xu J,Wu L,Chen W,et al.Leaching potential of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in soils[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,2010,29(4):800-807.
  • 7Cha J,Cupples AM.Triclocarban and triclosan biodegradation at field concentrations and the resulting leaching potentials in three agricultural soils[J].Chemosphere,2010,81(4):494-499.
  • 8Xu J,Chen W,Wu L,et al.Adsorption and degradation of ketoprofen in soils[J].Journal of Environmental Quality,2009,38(3):1177-1182.
  • 9Lim SJ,Fox P.Estimating the persistence of organic contaminants in indirect potable reuse systems using quantitative structure activity relationship(QSAR)[J].Science of the Total Environment,2012,433:1-7.
  • 10Gustafson DI.Groundwater ubiquity score:a simple method for assessing pesticide leachability[J].Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry,1989,8(4):339-357.

二级参考文献64

  • 1吴又先.土壤氧化还原过程及其生态效应[J].土壤学进展,1995,23(5):32-37. 被引量:7
  • 2王冉,刘铁铮,王恬.抗生素在环境中的转归及其生态毒性[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):265-270. 被引量:198
  • 3陈迪云,谢文彪,吉莉,李锦文,汤泽平.混合有机污染物在土壤中的竞争吸附研究[J].环境科学,2006,27(7):1377-1382. 被引量:22
  • 4ALLER L, BENETT T, LEHR J, et al. Drastic: a standardized system for evaluating ground water pollution potential using hydrogeologic settings[ R]. Washington DC: EPA, 1987.
  • 5GUZZELLA L, POZZONI F, GIULIANO G. Herbicide contamination of surficial groundwater in Northern Italy [ J ]. Environmental Pollution, 2006,142(2) :344-353.
  • 6CLOSE M E, FLINTOFT M J. National survey of pesticides in groundwater in New Zealand---2002 [ J ]. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research,2004,38(2):289-299.
  • 7PRIMI P,SURGAN M H,URBAN T. Leachillg potential of tuff care pesticides: A case sudy of Long Island Golf Courses[J]. Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation, 1994, 14 (3) : 129- 138.
  • 8ZHENG S Q, COOPER J F. Adsorption, desorption, and degradation of three pesticides in different soils[J]. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 1996,30( 1 ) : 15- 20.
  • 9EPA. EPI Suite v3.20[ CP ]. 2007. http://www. epa. gov/oppt/ exposure/docs/episuite. htm.
  • 10CARLSEN L. A combined QSAR and partial order ranking approach to risk assessment [ J]. SAR QSAR Environ Res, 2006,17(2) : 133-146.

共引文献42

同被引文献118

引证文献9

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部