期刊文献+

历史认知语言学:复杂性范式的兴起

Historical Cognitive Linguistics: The Rise of Complexity Paradigm
原文传递
导出
摘要 21世纪的认知语言学更加注重阐释特定文化模型和认知资源对概念结构和意义的构建及其生成机理,产生了历史认知语言学和认知社会语言学两个新分支。其中历史认知语言学结合认知语言学的基本理论和历史语言学的研究范式,试图建构一种新的研究范式,即语言被视为一个复杂自适应系统的研究方法,从而开启了认知语言学复杂性研究范式的兴起,预示着语言学研究向自然科学方向发展的趋势。这一新的研究范式必将推动认知语言学向一个更为广阔的空间发展。本文将对历史认知语言学的产生背景、研究范式、研究话题和方法等方面予以概述,并对该领域的发展前景予以展望。 Cognitive linguistics in the 21 stcentury is focused more on how specific cultural models and cognitive resources illustrate conceptual structure,meaning construction and its mechanism,resulting in tw o new branches of cognitive linguistics: cognitive sociolinguistics and historical cognitive linguistics.Historical cognitive linguistics combines the basic theory of cognitive linguistics and the research paradigm of historical linguistics,seeking to construct a new research paradigm in w hich language is view ed as a complex adaptive system(CAS).This has inspired the rise of a new research paradigm in cognitive linguistics,indicating the trend of linguistic research in the direction of natural sciences.This new paradigm w ill push cognitive linguistics tow ards a broader space for development.This paper begins w ith a brief introduction of historical cognitive linguistics as an emerging discipline,then elucidates its major research paradigm CAS,its main research topics and methodology,and finally concludes by exploring the prospects for future research of historical cognitive linguistics.
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期32-37,共6页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
关键词 历史认知语言学 认知语言学 复杂自适应系统 historical cognitive linguistics cognitive lin-guistics complex adaptive system
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Allan, K. 2010. Tracing metonymic polysemy through time: MATERIAL FOR OBJECT mappings in the OED[A]. In M. E. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan (eds.). Historical CognitiveLinguistics[ C]. New York:Mouton de Gruyter. Dirven,R. 1985.
  • 2Metaphor as basic means for extending the lexicon [ A ]. In P. Wolf & R. Dirven ( eds. ). The Ubiquity of Metaphor in Language and Thought [ C ]. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • 3Ellis, N. & D. Larsen-Freeman (eds.). 2009. Language as a Complex Adaptive System [ Z ]. Lansing : Language Learning Research Club in University of Michigan.
  • 4Fabiszak, M. & A. Hebda. 2010, Cognitive historical approa- ches to emotions:Pride[ A]. In M. Winters,H. Tissari & K. Allan ( eds. ). Historical Cognitive Linguistics [ C ]. New York : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 5Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces [ M]. New York: Cam- bridge University Press.
  • 6Fauconnier, G. & E. Sweetser (eds.). 1996. Spaces, Worlds, and Grammar[ C ]. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  • 7Geeraerts,D. 1988. Cognitive grammar and the history of lex- ical semantics [ A ]. In B. Rudzka-Ostyn ( ed. ). Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [ C ] . Amsterdam / Philadelphia : John Benjamins.
  • 8Geeraerts, D. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics: A Con- tribution to Historical Lexicology [M ]. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 9Geeraerts ,D. 1999. Diachronic prototype semantics- A digest [A]. In A. Blank & P. Koch (,eds.). Historical Semantics and Cognition [ C ]. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10Heyvaert, L. & H. Cuyckens. 2010. Finite and gerundive complementation in Modem and Present-day English:Seman- tics, variation and change [ A ]. In M. Winters, H. Tissari & K. Allan ( eds. ). Historical Cognitive Linguistics [ C ]. New York : Mouton de Gmyter.

二级参考文献33

  • 1黄国营.现代汉语的歧义短语[J].语言研究,1985,5(1):69-89. 被引量:19
  • 2王士元,柯津云.语言的起源及建模仿真初探[J].中国语文,2001(3):195-200. 被引量:23
  • 3王士元.演化语言学中的电脑建模[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,43(2):17-22. 被引量:15
  • 4王寅.《认知语法概论》[M].上海:上海外语教育出版社,2006.
  • 5Allan, K. 2010. Tracing metonymic polysemy through time: MATERIAL FOR OBJECT mapping in the OLD [A]. In M. Winters et al. (eds.), 2010. 163-196.
  • 6Bergs, A. &G. Diewald (eds.), 2008. Constructions and Language Change[C]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 7Bybee, J.2007. Diachronic linguistics [A]. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (eds.). The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics [C]. Oxford. OUP. 945-987.
  • 8Bybee, J. & P. Hopper. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
  • 9Bybee, J. & S. Thompson. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax [A]. In M. Juge & J. Moxley (eds.). Proceedings of the 23'a Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society[C]. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Society. 132-164.
  • 10Bynon, T. 1977. Historical Linguistics [M]. CUP.

共引文献144

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部