政府参与和中国企业OFDI行为——基于文献研究的视角被引量：5

下载PDF

导出

摘要近年来,中国等新兴经济体国家受到全球学者的高度关注,一些外国学者开始从制度视角对中国企业OFDI现象进行分析,试图探究企业OFDI的动机和行为方式。本文立足于对文献的系统梳理,从资源观和制度观理论相结合的视角对政府参与和中国企业OFDI行为进行综合分析。研究发现,中国政府对企业国际化的行为有重要的影响,主要体现在政府参与和作为制度主体对企业所处的制度环境的影响上。同时,政府参与会影响企业OFDI的意愿和能力,反过来,企业可以利用与政府的关系来获取有利于国际化的资源和政策环境。

作者齐晓飞关鑫崔新健

机构地区中央财经大学商学院首都经济贸易大学工商管理学院

出处《财经问题研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期117-123,共7页 Research On Financial and Economic Issues

基金教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"股东间合作机制终极控制权与上市公司绩效关系研究"(14YJC630040) 国家自然科学基金项目"真实控制权社会资本与上市公司终极股东剥夺行为研究"(71372200) 国家自然科学基金项目"跨国研发中心嵌入我国国家创新体系的模式及其效应的理论与实证研究"(71073178) 教育部高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金博导类资助课题"跨国研发中心嵌入与中国开放式NIS演化路径的理论与实证研究"(20130016110003)

关键词政府参与资源观制度观企业OFDI行为

分类号 F279.3 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1林毅夫,李永军.比较优势、竞争优势与发展中国家的经济发展[J].管理世界,2003,19(7):21-28. 被引量：399
2孙黎,阎大颖.任兵.像印度企业那样整合全球[J].中欧商业评论,2009,(7).
3Peng, M.W., Luo, Y. Managerial Ties and Finn Performance in a Transition Economy: The Nature of a Micro- Macro Link [ J ] . Academy of Management Journal, 2000, 43 (3) :486-501.
4Johanson, J. , Vahlne, J.E. The Uppsala Internationalization Process Model Revisited: From Liability of Foreignness to Liability of Outsidership [J]. Journal of International Business Studies,2009, 40(9) : 1411-1431.
5Ramamurti, R. The Obsolescing ' Bargaining Model' ? MNE- Host Developing Country Relations Revisited [ J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 2001, 32 ( 1 ) : 23-40.
6裴长洪,樊瑛.中国企业对外直接投资的国家特定优势[J].中国工业经济,2010(7):45-54. 被引量：144
7Qian, Y. Enterprise Reform in China: Agency Problems and Political Control [ J ]. Economics of Transition, 1996,4 (2) :427-447.
8Child, J. ,Lu, Y. Management Issues in China [ M ]. New York : Routledge, 1996.
9Wang, C. , Hong, J. , Kafouros, M. , Boateng, A. What Drives Outward FDI of Chinese Firms? Testing the Explanatory Power of Three Theoretical Frameworks [ J ] . International Business Review, 2012, 21 (3) :426-438.
10Boddewyn, J. J. , Brewer, T. International-Business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1994, 19(1): 119-144.

二级参考文献16

1Dunning, J.H. Explaining Changing Patterns of International Production: In Defence of the Electic Theory[J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 1979, (41).
2Dunning, J.H. Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach[J]. Review of World Economics, 1981, (117).
3Dunning, J.H. The Electic Paradigm of International Production: A Restatement and Some Possible Extensions [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1988, (19).
4Hymer, S. Intemational Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment [D]. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Teehonology, 1960.
5D. Black, and J.V. Henderson. A Theory of Urban Growth[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1999,(107).
6Hymer, S. et Rowthom, R. Multinational Corporations and International Oligopoly: The Non-American Challenge [A]. Kindleberger, C.P. The International Corporation: A Symposium[C]. Cambridge, M.I.T. Press, 1970.
7Head,K., J.Ries, and D.Swenson. Agglomeration Benefits and Location Choice: Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Investment in the United States[J]. Journal of International Economics, 1995,(38).
8Kogut, B. Normative Observations on the International Value-added Chain and Strategic Groups [J]. Journal of International Business Studies, 1984, (15).
9Lall, Sanjaya. Determinants of R&D in an LDC: The Indian Engineering Industry [J]. Economics Letters, 1983, (13).
10Markusen, J.R., and A.J. Venables. The Theory of Endowment, Intra-industry and Multinational Trade[J]. Journal of International Economics, 2000, (52).