期刊文献+

基于EPR的供应链治理机制博弈分析 被引量:12

Game analysis on supply chain governance mechanism based on extended producer responsibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 研究了生产者责任延伸(EPR)制度背景下的供应链系统中主体决策影响因素和治理机制的融合问题,基于供应链治理和博弈的理论视角,构造了个体生产者责任(IPR)模式下的非合作博弈模型和集体生产者责任(CPR)模式下的合作博弈模型,分别得出了IPR和CPR模式下企业污染治理技术的最佳决策.研究结果表明,企业的污染治理决策主要取决于企业之间生产技术的差距,以及相互依赖程度.强技术差距和强依赖性更容易导致CPR模式的产生;反之,IPR模式更容易出现在低依赖性和实力相当的企业当中.最后总结了EPR制度下供应链系统动态均衡治理的内部效率机制和外部合法性机制. Within the context of extended producer responsibility (EPR) policy, this study adopts a governance perspective to investigate the problem of integration for supply chain decision-making factors and governance mechanisms. Based on game theory, this paper builds cooperative game models under the individual producer responsibility (IPR) game mode and the collective producer responsibility (IPR) game mode, and obtains op- timal decisions of enterprises' pollution governance technology in both modes. Results show that the optimal decision depends largely on the technological gap and the degree of reliance among enterprises. Large tech- nological gap and strong degrees of reliance make the CPR mode more applicable. The IPR mode is more likely to be adopted by companies with weak degree of reliance. Finally, this paper summarizes the efficiency and legitimacy mechanism of the dynamic equilibrium governance in the supply chain system from both the internal and external perspectives under the EPR policy.
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期231-239,250,共10页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金重大资助项目(13&ZD147) 教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大资助项目(12JJD630004)
关键词 生产者责任延伸 供应链治理 博弈论 个体生产者责任(IPR) 集体生产者责任(CPR) extended producer responsibility supply chain governance game theory individual producerresponsibility collective producer responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Lindhqvist, T. Extended Producer Responsibility in Cleaner Production[D]. Swedish: Lunds Universitet, 2000.
  • 2Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Extended producer responsibility: A guidance manual for govern- ments[J]. Source OECD Territorial Economy, 2001(6): 1-159.
  • 3Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Economic Aaspects of extended producer responsibility[J]. Future Sur- vey, 2004, 26(11): 1-20.
  • 4Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Analytical framework for evaluating the costs and benefits of extended producer responsibility programmes[J]. OECD Papers, 2005, 6(8): 1-15.
  • 5Scheijgrond J. Extending producer responsibility up and down the supply chain, challenges and limitation[J]. Waste Management and Research, 2011, 29(9): 911-918.
  • 6Lai K, Wong C W Y, Venus Lun Y H. The role of customer integration in extended producer responsibility: A study of chinese export manufacturers[J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2014, 147(Part B): 284-293.
  • 7Atasu A, Subramanian R. Extended producer responsibility for E-Waste: Individual or collective producer responsibility[J]. Produc- tion and Operations Management, 2012, 21 (6): 1042-1059.
  • 8Lifset R, Lindhqvist T. Producer responsibility at a turning point[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2008, 12(2): 144-147.
  • 9Rahimifard S, Coates G, Staikos T, et al. Barriers, drivers and challenges for sustainable product recovery and recycling[J]. Interna- tional Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 2009, 2(2): 80-90.
  • 10Subramanian R, Gupta S, Talbot B. Product design and supply chain coordination under extended producer responsibility[J]. Pro- duction and Operations Management, 2009, 18(3): 259-277.

二级参考文献54

共引文献59

同被引文献108

引证文献12

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部