摘要
当代学者对近代的"民权"概念颇多误读。康有为等人是在与纲常名教相对的话语场景中使用"民权"一词,主要针对"三纲",表达普遍的个人自主性为正当的观念。康派"民权"的核心和根底是"人人自主之权",由此基点进一步向公领域延展,才突破了传统民本思想的局限,构筑出一个以"民"为国家权力本源的公共秩序新图谱。承继康派"民权"精神的革命派,则主要是在东方与西方、民众与君主、汉人与满人的话语结构中使用"民权",他们关于"民权"之正当性和必要性的论证范式,不仅可能侵害了个人自主观念的社会基础,也导致了民权之内在核心价值的消散。
The concept of Minquan is much more misunderstood by the contemporary scholars.Compared with the traditional ideas,Kang Youwei and his colleagues used Minquan to express generally personal autonomy as the legitimate concept.So 'everyone's autonomy' is the core and basis of Kang' Minquan,and it breaks through the limitation of traditional people-based thought,building up a new blueprint of public order in which the legitimacy of state power is originated from people.The revolutionaries who inherited the spirit of Kang' Minquan are mainly using Minquan in the discourse structure of east & west,people & monarch,Hans & Manchu.Their arguments for the legitimacy and necessity of Minquan not only could infringe upon the social basis of individual autonomy concept,but also weaken the core value significance.
出处
《法学家》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第2期140-154,179-180,共15页
The Jurist
关键词
民权
康有为
人人自主之权
个人权利
革命
Minquan
Kang Youwei
Everyone's Autonomy
Human right
Revolution
