请求权抑或侵权责任：知识产权法中“停止侵害”性质探析

Anspruch or Tort Liability: Anglicizing the Nature of “Permanent Injunction” in Intellectual Property Law

停止侵害的性质疑题,学术界存在"请求权说"、"侵权责任说"、"折衷说"之争,其中观点各有优劣,需要反思检讨、区别对待。无论是理论上的知识产权停止侵害请求权,抑或是立法中的知识产权侵权责任承担方式,二者并非完全对立之关系,前者蕴含的理论研究意义,后者承载的制度运用价值,均可统一于法律体系框架之内,共同构筑停止侵害救济方法的制度基础。

On the question of permanent injunction＇s nature, in academia, there exist disputes of ＂anspruch＂, ＂the tort liability＂ and ＂the compromise ＂, in which ideas, have advantages and disadvantages, need to be reflected on the review and treated differently. Whether it is theoretically ＂anspruch＂ of intellectual property claims, or it is the system of intellectual property infringement liability in the legislation, they are not entirely antagonistic relationship, the former contains the theoretical significance, the latter carrying value of system use, both of them can unified within the framework of the legal system and construct the basis of infringement remedies institution.