期刊文献+

论责任保险的基本预防机制及其效果——以侵权法的预防功能为参照 被引量:1

On Basic Prevention Mechanisms of Liability Insurance and Their Effects:In Contrast with Prevention Functions of Tort Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 责任保险在加强侵权法补偿功能的同时,也破坏了侵权法的预防功能,此即责任保险中的道德危险的根本成因。为消除该道德危险,责任保险中相应地设计了经验费率、赔偿限额、免赔额、不保风险、代位权等基本预防机制。但是,通过对侵权法的预防功能、责任保险的基本预防机制以及二者内在关联的分析发现:责任保险不可能完全恢复侵权法的预防功能;责任保险对侵权法预防功能的消极影响不可避免。因此,必须建立多元化的机制来加强责任保险条件下的事故预防。 While liability insurance strengthened the compensation function of tort law,it destroyed the prevention function of tort law also,which leads to moral risks in liability insurance. Therefore,several prevention mechanisms were designed for avoiding such moral risks,including experience ration,limits of indemnity,deductibles,no- covered risks and subrogation. However,through analysis of the prevention function of tort law,the prevention mechanisms in liability insurance,and the relationship of both,it is found that liability insurance is impossible to resume the prevention function of tort law completely,and that the negative effect of liability insurance is inevitable. Thus,a multi- mechanism should be established to enhance the prevention function under the condition of liability insurance.
作者 叶延玺
出处 《广西政法管理干部学院学报》 2015年第2期110-116,共7页 Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law
关键词 责任保险 侵权法 预防机制 经验费率 liability insurance tort law prevention mechanism experience rating
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

  • 1关淑芳.论惩罚性赔偿责任的可保性[J].当代法学,2006,20(1):95-100. 被引量:11
  • 2[奥]赫尔穆特·考茨欧,[奥]瓦内萨·威尔科克斯主编,窦海洋译.惩罚性赔偿金:普通法与大陆法的视角[M].北京:中国法制出版社,2012.
  • 3Note, An Economic Analysis of the Plantiff's Windfall from Punitive Damage Litigation, Harvard Law Re- view, Vol. 105, 1992, pp. 1900 -1919.
  • 4David G. Owen, A Punitive Damages Overview: Functions, Problems and Reform, Villanova Law Review, Vol. 39, 1994, p. 382.
  • 5James B. Sales & Kenneth B. Cole, Jr. , Punitive Damages: A Relic That Has Outlived Its Origins, Van- derbilt Law Review, Vol. 37, 1984, pp. 1154 - 1158.
  • 6Samuel Freifield, The Rationale of Punitive Damages, Law Journal, Jan. , 1935, pp. 6 - 8.
  • 7Michael J Legg, Economic Guidelines for Awarding Exemplary Damages, Monash University Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2004, pp.303-316.
  • 8George L. Priest, Insurability and Punitive Damages, Alabama Law Review, Vol. 40, No. 3, 1989, p. 1010.
  • 9Samuel Freifield, The Rationale of Punitive Damages, Law Journal, Jan. , 1935, pp. 5 -14.
  • 10Steven G. Schumaier & Brian A. Mckinsey, The Insurability of Punitive Damages, ABA Journal, Vo. 72, 1986, pp. 68 - 70.

引证文献1

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部