摘要
审判实践中,我国各海事法院、一审和二审法院就海上人身损害赔偿案件如何适用"受诉法院所在地"问题上意见不统一。针对这一问题,通过案例分析,得出其产生的原因,并结合对比分析我国不同法院对这一问题的不同操作原则,提出将"受诉法院所在地"理解为实际审判法院或法庭所在地,根据赔偿权利人的诉求让赔偿权利人对其主张负"住所地或经常居住地"的举证责任,以期对这一问题在全国法院得到适用上的统一有所帮助。
In trial practice, there are different adoptions on application of "the place where the accepting court is located" to the calculation standard of the maritime personal injury compensation in the maritime courts, the courts of first instance and the courts of second instance of the People' s Republic of China. This paper brings out the causes of the different adoptions based on the specific cases and makes a comparative analysis on the different operation principles to the issue in different courts of the People' s Republic of China. This paper proposes that "the place where the accepting court is located" shall be comprehended as the actual trial court or the place where the court is located and the obligee to compensation shall bear the burden of proving "the domicile or habitual residence" according to the appeal of the obligee to compensation. This paper aims to contribute to the universal application to the calculation standard of the maritime personal injury compensation in court at all levels of the People' s Republic of China.
出处
《中国海商法研究》
CSSCI
2015年第1期102-105,共4页
Chinese Journal of Maritime Law
关键词
海上人身损害赔偿
受诉法院所在地
举证责任
maritime personal injury compensation
the place where the accepting court is located
burden of proof