期刊文献+

庄子语境中的“德”“形”之辨

On the Meanings and Differences of “De”and “Shape”in Zhuang Zi's Context
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在庄子的哲学语境下,"德"不仅具有形上性与内在性,而且也具有形下性与实践性;相对而言,"形"虽然也具有一定的形上性,但更多的还是形下性与外在性的。在"德"与"形"的价值判断上,庄子看重的是内在之德,而非外在之形。庄子以游心于德和为基点,以德兼于道为理路,以辨德之本末,以论德之立修,以别德形关系;不仅表达了他对当时之世的不满与批判,而且也揭露了当时世人的伪善与狡诈。一言以蔽之,庄子视域中的"德""形"关系与价值取向是:一、形残而德可全;德全胜于形全;才全而德不形;二、重"德"不重"形";重内不重外;重自然与无为,不重雕饰与有为。 In Zhuang Zi's philosophy,"De"is not only moral philosophical and metaphysical and internal,but also materialistic and practical. Relatively speaking,"Shape"is more materialistic and external although it was metaphysical. Between "De"and "Shape",Zhuang Zi emphasizes the inherent virtue of "De"rather than the external "Shape". Zhuang Zi not only expresses his dissatisfaction and criticism to the society,but also exposes the hypocrisy and the cunning of the people at the time,through a cardinal points wimming in the mind and a logic way of the unification of Mind and Way,to debate the fundamental and the incidental of Mind,to view the education of morality,to distinguish the relationship between morality and form. Certainly,in the natural and do- nothing philosophical context of Zhuang Zi's,Zhuang Zi fills with the yearning to natural and simple world,and yearning for simple and harmonious society. Although we may believe that the aspirations of Zhuang Zi's is a appeal to the Utopian in the face the cruel reality,we cannot ignore the metaphysic of moral philosophy of Zhuang Zi's. In a word,the relationship and value orientation between "morality"and "shape"in the view of Zhuang Zi's is "De"to be perfect,"De"over "Shape"and "De"no seeing; and stressed "De"not emphasizing "Shape",stressed inner not emphasizing outside,stressed natural and inaction not emphasizing carving and promising.
作者 王传林
出处 《阴山学刊》 2015年第2期81-88,共8页 Yinshan Academic Journal
关键词 庄子 意涵 特性 逻辑关系 Zhuang Zi Mind(Te / De) Shape Meanings Characteristics Logical relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1清·郭庆藩.庄子集释(上)[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
  • 2朱谦之.老子校释[M].北京:中华书局,1984..
  • 3魏·王弼,著.王弼集校释(上)[M].楼宇烈,校释.北京:中华书局,1980.
  • 4汉·司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959.
  • 5汉·刘熙,清·毕沅,王先谦.释名疏证补[M].北京:中华书局,2008.
  • 6[宋]朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
  • 7王传林.德与德不形——略论庄子道德哲学语境下的“德”之内蕴[J].武陵学刊,2014,39(6):6-12. 被引量:1

二级参考文献6

  • 1王弼.王弼集校释(上)[M].北京:中华书局,1980:126.
  • 2朱谦之.老子校释[M].北京:中华书局,1984..
  • 3苏舆.春秋繁露义证[M].北京:中华书局,1992..
  • 4司马迁.史记[M].北京:中华书局,1959..
  • 5黎翔凤.管子校注(中)[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
  • 6张京华.道德说[J].武陵学刊,2013,38(1):1-11. 被引量:4

共引文献733

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部