期刊文献+

血清PSA联合Gleason评分与临床分期预测前列腺癌核素骨显像的影响分析 被引量:3

Impact Analysis of Serum PSA Combined Gleason Score and Clinical Stage of Prostate Cancer Bone Scintigraphy to Predict
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的 探究血清PSA联合Gleason评分与临床分期预测前列腺癌素骨显像结果关系。方法 随机选取2010年3月至2014年3月我院收治的前列腺癌患者117例,根据血清PSA与Gleason评分,对比各不同临界值的NPV、PPV,并预测分析骨显像结果。结果 PSA0-10 ng/m L、Gleason评分〈8分患者,PPV、NPV分别为71%、100%;PSA〉100 ng/m L/Gleason评分〉7分患者,NPV、PPV分别为42%、93%,提示血清PSA水平与Gleason评分及临床分期,都是前列腺癌骨显像的独立预测因子。结论 在诊疗上,对T1、T2分期患者行ECT骨显像,可降低治疗反应,而T3、T4期患者,骨转移已经发生。 Objective To explore the serum PSA combined Gleason score and clinical stage of prostate cancer hormone predict bone imaging relationship. Methods The patients were randomly selected 117 cases of prostate cancer from March 2010 to March 2014 in our hospital, according to serum PSA and Gleason score, comparing the different threshold NPV, PPV, and predictive analysis bone imaging.Results PSA0-10 ng/mL, Gleason score less than 8 minutes patients, PPV, NPV were 71%, 100%; PSA greater than 100 ng/mL/Gleason score greater than 7 points patient, NPV, PPV 42%, 93%, suggesting that serum PSA level and Gleason score and clinical stage, prostate cancer is an independent predictor of bone scintigraphy.Conclusion In the treatment of T1, T2 stage underwent ECT bone imaging, can reduce treatment response, and T3, T4 patients with bone metastasis has occurred.
作者 张琦
出处 《中国医药指南》 2015年第11期9-10,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 血清PSA GLEASON评分 临床分期 前列腺癌 骨显像 Serum PSA Gleason score Clinical stage Prostate cancer Bone scintigraphy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1陈雅清,屈婉莹,朱明.核素骨显像对诊断前列腺癌骨转移的临床价值[J].中华核医学杂志,1994,14(3):175-175. 被引量:35
  • 2Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics,2007. CA Cancer J Clin, 2007, 57 ( 1 ) : 43..66.
  • 3Partin AW, Kattan MW, Subong EN, et al. Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update. JAMA, 1997, 277 (18): 1445-1451.
  • 4Seaman EK, Whang IS, Cooner W, et al. Predictive value of prostate specific antigen density for the presence of mierometastatic carcinoma of the prostate. Urology, 1994, 43 (5) : 645-648.
  • 5Taneja SS, Hsu EI, Cheli CD, et al. Complexed prostate specific antigen as a staging tool: Results based on a muhicenter prospective evaluation of complexed prostate specific antigen in cancer diagnosis. Urology, 2002, 60( 4 Supp 1) : 10-17.
  • 6Horiguchi A, Nakashima J, Horiguchi Y,et al. Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate, 2003, 56( 1 ) : 23-29.
  • 7Shinohara K, Wolf JS Jr, Narayan P, et al. Comparison of prostate specific antigen with prostate specific antigen density for 3 cli-nical applications. J Urol, 1994, 152 (1) : 120-123.
  • 8Custovic Z, Kraus O, Tomaskovic I, et al. Serum tPSA, cPSA, related density parameters and chromogranin A as predictors of positive margins after radical prostatectomy. Anticancer Res, 2007, 27(4C) : 2817-2821.
  • 9Giannarini G, Scott CA, Moro U, et al. Are PSA density and PSA density of the transition zone more accurate than PSA in pre- dicting the pathological stage of clinically localized prostate cancer? Uro! Oncol, 2008, 26(4) : 353-360.
  • 10Poulakis V, Witzsch U, De Vries R, et al. Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate specific antigen, and Gleason score to predict prostate cancer stage. J Urol, 2004, 172(4 Pt 1) : 1306-1310.

共引文献31

同被引文献28

引证文献3

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部