加权平均合格率综合评价公共场所卫生方法探讨

Study on evaluation of public health by comprehensive weighed average qualified rate

目的探讨加权平均合格率综合评价公共场所卫生的可行性。方法选取5家旅店监测数据,用指数综合评价法和加权平均合格率法评价,并对两种方法评价结果进行比对。结果两种方法评价5家旅店合格3家,不合格2家,与评价结果是否合格是吻合的,评价结果排序是相同的。但评价等级方面有差异,评价合格3家旅店中,指数法有1家良好,2家合格,而加权平均合格率法2家良好,1家合格。不合格2家旅店中,指数法2家都较差;而加权平均合格率法1家较差,另1家很差。结论两种方法评价结果基本相符,加权平均合格率综合评价公共场所卫生是可行的。

Objective To explore the feasibility of public health by weighted average qualified rate of the comprehensive evaluation. Methods The monitoring data in five hotels was analyzed by use of the index comprehensive evaluation method and weighted average qualified rate method and the results were compared. Results The two methods were adopted to evaluate the five hotels, three of them are qualified and another two are unqualified. The evaluation qualified result and order are the same. But there are differences in the evaluation grade. In the three qualified hotels, one is good and two are qualified by using the index methods, and two are good and one is qualified by using weighted average qualified rate method. Conclusion The evaluation results by the two methods are basically consistent. The weighted average qualified rate of comprehensive evaluation in public health is feasible.