期刊文献+

The Production of Patents and Evolution of the Production of Knowledge around Snow Avalanches

The Production of Patents and Evolution of the Production of Knowledge around Snow Avalanches
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Scientific research on snow avalanches is relatively modem, yet in constant and rapid evolution, as the multiple disciplines involved in its development will, in turn, become more specialized and more technical. Patents are part of research and knowledge production. The scientific community and policy makers are increasingly interested in production of knowledge collaboratively. Almost all of the research being conducted on snow avalanches uses technology, technique or instrumentation. One main objective of this study is to draw from the literature the many technologies, techniques and instrumentations that are being used in research related to avalanches. Thus, a textual analysis of the most significant literature in the field of snow avalanches was done. In this analysis, techniques, technologies and instrumentations have emerged. A patent search has been done in databases. Subsequently, patents were conceptualized. The proportion of applicants for patents is higher in industry than in universities. The measure of exploration of the ongoing sociocognitive transformations of science and technology systems presents a useful tool to conduct a study to explore these transformations. It would be interesting for the scientific community, but also for the industry, to elaborate concept mapping when applied to avalanche research, which would help in determining referents.
出处 《Journal of Earth Science and Engineering》 2015年第1期76-85,共10页 地球科学与工程(英文版)
关键词 AVALANCHES patents KNOWLEDGE conceptual map technology collaboration. 专利检索 知识生产 雪崩 技术系统 进化 生产知识 文本分析 多学科
  • 相关文献

参考文献113

  • 1Gambardella, A., Giuri, P., Mariani, M., Giovannoni, S. 2005. "Study on Evaluating the Knowledge Economy What Are Patents Actually Worth? The Value of Patents for Today's Economy and Society". Technical report for the European Commission research project (ETD/2004/IM/E3/77).
  • 2Bhattacharya, S., and Meyer, M. 2003. "Large Firms and the Science-Technology Interface--Patents, Patent Citations, and Scientific Output of Multinational Corporations in Thin Films." Scientometrics 58 (2): 265-79.
  • 3Powell, W. W., and Snellman, K. 2004. "The Knowledge Economy." Annual Review of Sociology 30:199-220.
  • 4Carayol, N., and Matt, M. 2004. "Does Research Organization Influence Academic Production? Laboratory Level Evidence from a Large European University." Research Policy 33 (8): 1081-102.
  • 5Carayol, N., and Matt, M. 2004. "The Exploitation of Complementarities in Scientific Production Process at the Laboratory Level." Technovation 24 (6): 455-65.
  • 6Tuzi, F. 2005. "Useful Science is Good Science: Empirical Evidence from the Italian National Research Council."Technovation 25 (5): 505-12.
  • 7Pavitt, K. 1998. "The Social Shaping of the National Science Base." Research Policy 27: 793-805.
  • 8Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., and van Oort, F. 2009. "The Geography of Collaborative Knowledge Production in Europe." Annals of Regional Science 43 (3): 721-38.
  • 9Hoekman, J., Frenken, K., and Tijssen, R. J. W. 2010. "Research Collaboration at a Distance: Changing Spatial Patterns of Scientific Collaboration within Europe. " Research Policy 39 (5): 662-73.
  • 10Scherngell, T., and Barber, M. J. 2009. "Spatial Interaction Modelling of Cross-Region R&D Collaborations: Empirical Evidence from the EU Framework Programmes." Papers in Regional Science 88 (3): 531-46.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部