期刊文献+

情绪背景和社会预期对社会经济决策行为的影响 被引量:3

The Effect of Emotional Context and Expectation on Social Economic Decision-making
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用最后通牒博弈范式,探讨不同情绪背景对社会经济决策中社会预期效应的影响。以90名大学生为被试,利用不同效价的电影片段(正性、负性和中性)诱发相应的目标情绪。通过操作社会规范性信息启动被试对分配方案公平性的不同预期。结果发现:在负性和中性情绪背景下,高预期组更倾向于拒绝接受不公平分配。在正性情绪背景下,高预期组和低预期组面对不公平提议时的接受率没有显著差异。结果表明正性情绪背景使社会预期效应发生改变,回应者对分配方案的高预期不再对决策结果产生显著影响。 In the present study, we extended social expectation effects research by examining the influence of induced task-irrelevant emotional context and its positive or negative valence on this decision bias. This question was in- vestigated by inducing 2 basic emotional states (amusement or sadness) that were compared with a neutral-emo- tion control group. Decision making was assessed with a well-studied social task, the Ultimatum Game. The re- sults revealed that: 1) negative and neutral emotional contexts had no significant effect on social expectations, whereby those with high expectation rejecting significantly more unfair offers than those participants who expected low offers in the UG. 2) positive emotional context played an important role in biasing expectation effects on so- cial interactive decision-making. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that a task-irrelevant positive e- motional context can have a significant impact on social decision-making. Specifically, social expectation no longer affected subjects' decision-making following exposure to emotionally pleasant movie clip .
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期191-197,共7页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金(11YJC190026) 天津师范大学博士基金(52WW1116) 天津师范大学实验室改革研究基金(2014)
关键词 预期 情绪背景 最后通牒博弈 决策 expectation, emotional context, the Ultimatum Game, decision-making
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1李芳,朱昭红,白学军.高兴和悲伤电影片段诱发情绪的有效性和时间进程[J].心理与行为研究,2009,7(1):32-38. 被引量:49
  • 2王芹,白学军.最后通牒博弈中回应者的情绪唤醒和决策行为研究[J].心理科学,2010,33(4):844-847. 被引量:17
  • 3王芹,白学军,郭龙健,沈德立.负性情绪抑制对社会决策行为的影响[J].心理学报,2012,44(5):690-697. 被引量:31
  • 4张光楠,周仁来.情绪对注意范围的影响:动机程度的调节作用[J].心理与行为研究,2013,11(1):30-36. 被引量:18
  • 5Albarracin, D., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003) . Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84 (3) , 453-469.
  • 6Chang, L. J., Smith, A., Dufwenberg, M., & Sanfey, A. G, (2011) . Triangulating the neural, psychological, and economic bases of guih aversion. Neuron, 70 (3) , 560-72.
  • 7Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2013) . Great expectations: Neural computations underlying the use of social norms in decision- making. Social Cognition and Affecivet Neuroscience, 8 (3) , 277-284.
  • 8Davidson, R. J. (2003) . Mfective neuroscience and psychophysiolo- gy: Toward a synthesis. Psychophysiology, 40 (5) , 655-665.
  • 9Delgado, M. R., Frank, R. H., & Phelps, E. A. (2005) . Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward dur- ing the trust game. Nature Neuroscience, 8 (11) , 1611-1618.
  • 10Ekman, P. (1999) . Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.) , Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45-60) . Sussex, U. K.: John Wiley & Son.

二级参考文献75

  • 1郑希付.不同情绪模式图片的和词语刺激启动的时间效应[J].心理学报,2004,36(5):545-549. 被引量:52
  • 2白露,马慧,黄宇霞,罗跃嘉.中国情绪图片系统的编制——在46名中国大学生中的试用[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2005,19(11):719-722. 被引量:316
  • 3李雪冰,罗跃嘉.情绪和记忆的相互作用[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):3-7. 被引量:35
  • 4王振宏,郭德俊,游旭群,高培霞.身体攻击行为学生自主神经活动的情绪唤醒特点[J].心理学报,2007,39(2):277-284. 被引量:24
  • 5Camerer, C. (1997). Progress in behavioral game theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11, 167- 188.
  • 6Camerer, C. F. ( 2003 ). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • 7Eckel, C. C. , & Grc,ssman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic Inquiry, 39, 171 - 188.
  • 8Eckel, C. C. , & Grossman, P. J. (2005). Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In. C. Plott and V. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, New York: North Holland.
  • 9Guth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(4), 367- 388.
  • 10Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowl,s, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E. , Gintis, H. , et al. (2001). In search of homo economics: Experiments in 15 small - scale societies. American Economic Review, 91(2), 73-79.

共引文献108

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部