从法解释学的角度论我国行政证据与刑事证据的衔接

On the Convergence of Administrative Evidence and Criminal Evidence in China from the Perspective of Legal Hermeneutics

行政机关在执法和查办案件过程中收集到的某些证据可以在刑事诉讼中运用,奠定了行政证据和刑事证据衔接的基础,明确了部分行政证据在刑事诉讼中的证据能力,但仅有一个条文的规定显然不够,在具体的操作中也会遇到一些问题。在传统的解释方法下,学者对"行政机关""等证据材料""可以"相关概念的解读有较多争议,为了准确地探讨两法衔接机制中的相关概念,从法解释学的角度出发,借助文义解释、体系解释、目的解释等手段,进一步分析我国行政证据、刑事证据应当如何衔接。

The Criminal Procedure Law（2012）regulates some administrative evidence can be directly adopted in the process of criminal procedure in certain cases,which not only lays the foundation of administrative evidence and criminal evidence,but also makes clear about the testifying capability of parts of administrative evidence in criminal suit.However,it also brings forth some problems because the rules are too fuzzy.Under the interpretation of the traditional methods,there are many controversies on the interpretations of some concepts,such as＂administrative organs＂＂the relevant evidence materials＂and＂can＂.By adopting literal interpretation,systematical interpretation and teleological interpretation,this study analyzes how to promote the convergence of criminal evidence and administrative evidence in China from the perspective of legal hermeneutics.