期刊文献+

以财富指数测量生活水平的相关问题研究

Study on issues of wealth index for measurements of living standard
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究以不同方法构建的财富指数的一致性,及其与传统方法测量的生活水平结果的比较。方法:利用2011年对宁夏回族自治区6 612户农村家庭(共28 886人)开展的入户调查数据,分别采取主成分分析、等权重等不同的赋权方法并纳入不同变量类型,构建4种不同的财富指数,对其结果的一致性进行分析;并分别与家庭总消费、家庭人均消费和家庭等值人均消费这三种传统方法得到的人群生活水平结果进行比较。结果:采用不同方法构建的财富指数间一致性较强;财富指数与消费指标间一致性较弱。结论:反映生活水平的不同指标各有优缺点,其测量结果间的一致性也较弱,因此当生活水平作为主要研究结果或影响结果的主要因素时,应结合采用不同生活水平指标得到的研究结果以及专业知识和经验,选择合适的生活水平指标。 Objective: To study the agreement of wealth index constructed using different methods,and the comparison of living standard measurements by the wealth index and traditional indicators. Methods: The data used in the study come from Rural Household Survey in Ningxia region,and the sample of this household survey included6612 households,28886 people. Using different weighting methods,such as principal component analysis and equal weighting,and data coded in different ways to construct 4 wealth indexes,and analyzing the agreement of these 4wealth indexes. Respectively comparing the wealth indexes with the living standard measurements by total,per capital and per adult household consumption. Results: The wealth indexes showed strong agreement with each other,and similarly weak agreement with consumption indicators. Conclusion: the indicators of living standard measurements each had advantages and disadvantages,and there was weak agreement between these indicators. Thus,when living standard was the main study result or the social determinant of study results,the appropriate indicator in the study should be selected according to the study results by different indicators and professional knowledge and experiences.
出处 《中国卫生政策研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期46-50,共5页 Chinese Journal of Health Policy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71303056) 美国中华医学基金会公开竞标项目(13-163)
关键词 财富指数 消费指标 生活水平 Wealth index Consumption indicator Living standard
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1程迪尔,官海静,刘国恩.生活水平指标选择对健康公平测算结果的影响[J].中国卫生经济,2013,32(3):79-81. 被引量:3
  • 2Rutstein S O. The DHS Wealth Index: Approaches for rural and urban areas[R]. Washington, DC: Macro International Inc, 2008.
  • 3Howe L D, Hargreaves J R, Huttly S R. Issues in the construction of wealth indices for the measurement of socio-economic position in low-income countries[J]. Emerg Themes Epidemiol, 2008, 5: 3.
  • 4Montgomery M R, Gragnolati M, Burke K A, et al. Measuring living standards with proxy variables[J]. Demography, 2000, 37(2): 155-174.
  • 5Lindelow M. Sometimes more equal than others: how health inequalities depend on the choice of welfare indicator[J]. Health Econ, 2006, 15(3): 263-279.
  • 6Somi M F, Butler J R, Vahid F, et al. Use of proxy measures in estimating socioeconomic inequalities in malaria prevalence[J]. Trop Med Int Health, 2008, 13(3): 354-364.
  • 7O\'Donnell O, Van Doorslaer E, Wagstaff A, et al. Analyzing health equity using household survey data: a guide to techniques and their implementation[M]. Washington DC: World Bank, 2008.
  • 8Howe L D, Hargreaves J R, Gabrysch S, et al. Is the wealth index a proxy for consumption expenditure? A systematic review[J]. J Epidemiol Community Health, 2009, 63(11): 871-877.

二级参考文献3

共引文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部