摘要
《徵圣》具有独立的价值,它提出了文章的创作主体和以圣人之文为标准的创作准则。将《徵圣》与《宗经》进行比较,从逻辑上得出《徵圣》为《宗经》之前提,二者内容相似但论述重点有所不同。另外,《徵圣》提出的为文标准与刘勰于此篇所提的"体要"观在全书也得到了由始而终的贯彻。因此,纪昀评价《徵圣》的"装点门面"说有其不当之处。
Zheng Sheng＇ s value is embodied in file body of article＇ s creation and the writing criterion of the saint classics＇ standard. Comparing the Zheng Sheng with Zortg .ling, it can be concluded that Zheng Sheng is the premise of Zong Jing in the logic, their contents are similar but the focal points are different. In addition, the writing standards proposed by Zheng Sheng and the body view of Liu Xie are implemented in the whole book. Therefore, Ji Yun evaluated that Zheng Sheng＂ s tokenism was improper.
出处
《河北科技师范学院学报（社会科学版）》
2015年第1期56-59,共4页
Journal of Hebei Normal University of Science & Technology(Social Sciences)
