期刊文献+

基于贝叶斯理论与Vine Copula的化工过程异常事件数的预测

Forecasting Abnormal Event Numbers in Chemical Process with Bayesian Theory and Vine Copula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对化工过程风险,提出了一种化工过程异常事件数的预测方法。化工生产过程中由于受到干扰,时常发生异常事件。异常事件如果得不到有效控制将引发生产事故,其发生次数越高表明发生生产事故的概率越大,因此,准确预测化工过程异常事件数有助于提高化工过程的风险管理水平。基于操作班组,采用贝叶斯理论与Vine Copula建立了动态预测模型,实现对化工过程一个轮班内异常事件数的预测。 A prediction method is proposed to cope with abnormal event numbers, which often appear in chemical process due to external disturbance. If an abnormal event is not effectively controlled, it will probably result in an accident. The higher abnormal event numbers are, the greater the probability of production accidents is. Therefore, the precise prediction on the abnormal event numbers can effectively improve the risk management level on the chemical process. Usually, four operating teams work in a workshop and the number of abnormal event varies from team to team. Based on operating teams, the dynamic prediction model is constructed by using the Bayesian theory and Vine Copula such that the abnormal event numbers in a operating team can be predicted.
出处 《华东理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期144-150,共7页 Journal of East China University of Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金(21176072)
关键词 风险管理 异常事件 操作班组 贝叶斯理论 VINE COPULA risk management abnormal event operating team Bayesian theory Vine Copula
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1贾伟,朱建新,高增梁,包其富.区域定量风险评价方法及其在化工园区中的运用[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(5):140-146. 被引量:28
  • 2Reniers G L L, Serensen K, Dullaert W. A multi attribute systemic risk index for comparing and prioritizing chemical industrial areas[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safe- ty, 2012, 98(1): 35-42.
  • 3Yu Qian, Jiang Juncheng, Yu Hanhua. Research on the emergency response system of major dangerous chemical acci- dent on highway based on the GIS[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2012, 45: 716-721.
  • 4He Guizhen, Zhang Lei, Lu Yonglong, et al. Managing major chemical accidents in China: Towards effective risk information[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2011, 187 (1) : 171-181.
  • 5Cox P, Niewohner J, Pidgeon N, et al. The use of mental models in chemical risk protection: Developing a generic workplace methodology[J]. Risk Analysis, 2003, 23 (2) : 311-324.
  • 6Meel A, Seider W D. Plant-specific dynamic failure assess- ment using Bayesian theory [J]. Chemical Engineering Sci- ence, 2006, 61(21): 7036-7056.
  • 7Huang David, Chen Toly, Wang M J J. A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2001, 118(1): 153-165.
  • 8Raftery A E, Gneiting T, Balabdaoul F, et al. Using Bayes Jan model averaging to calibrate forecast ensembles [J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2005, 133(5):1155-1174.
  • 9林震,杨浩.基于车速的交通事故贝叶斯预测[J].中国安全科学学报,2003,13(2):34-36. 被引量:41
  • 10Duan Qingyun, Ajami N K, Gao Xiaogang, et al. Multi- model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging[J]. Advances in Water Resources, 2007, 30(5): 1371-1386.

二级参考文献15

共引文献157

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部