期刊文献+

骨髓单个核细胞与骨髓间充质干细胞促进大鼠皮瓣存活率的比较 被引量:1

Comparison between Bone Marrow-derived Mononuclear Cells and Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Promoting Survival Rates of Random-pattern Skin Flap in Rats
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较来源于等量骨髓的单个核细胞与经扩增的间充质干细胞,促进大鼠随意皮瓣成活率的效果。方法取等质等量的大鼠骨髓,一半直接离心获得骨髓单个核细胞,一半经体外培养获得骨髓间充质干细胞,注射相等数量(n=6)的大鼠随意皮瓣。术后测量并计算皮瓣成活面积,取材,行组织学检测,计数CD31阳性血管数量。结果未经培养的骨髓单个核细胞组皮瓣的平均存活率为(71.6±8.4)%,培养的骨髓间充质干细胞组平均存活率为(66.2±3.1)%,这两组存活率均显著高于注射平衡液的对照组(55.9±3.4)%;注射细胞组之间平均存活率没有统计学差异。组织学血管密度计数显示,骨髓单个核细胞组和骨髓间充质干细胞组的微血管数量分别是(58.2±6.8)和(42.7±5.1),都显著高于PBS对照组(22.8±3.1),而骨髓单个核细胞组也显著高于骨髓间充质干细胞组。结论与不经培养的骨髓单个核细胞相比,通过体外扩增的骨髓间充质细胞,未能显著提高大鼠随意皮瓣的成活率。 Objective To compare the non-cultured bone marrow mononuclear cells(BM-MNCs) and cultured bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells(BMSCs) in the promotion of random-pattern skin flap survival of rats. Methods BM-MNCs and BMSCs derived from two identical rat bone marrow aspirates were injected in a random-pattern skin flap model of rat(n=6). The survival area was determined by its appearance, color and texture. Capillary density of flaps was measured by histology. Results The flap survival rates were(71.6±8.4)% in the BM-MNC-treated group and(66.2±3.1)% in the BMSCtreated group, both of which were significantly higher than the control group(55.9 ±3.4)%. However, no significant difference was observed between the cell transplanted groups. According to vessel density assay, capillary density in the BM-MNC-treated group(58.2±6.8) was higher than in the BMSC-treated group(42.7±5.1), both of which were significantly higher than the control group(22.8±3.1). Conclusion Pre-culture of BMSCs does not bring therapeutic benefits.
出处 《组织工程与重建外科杂志》 2015年第2期90-94,共5页 Journal of Tissue Engineering and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划("973"项目)(2011CB964704) 国家自然科学基金(81271714 31170944)
关键词 随意皮瓣 细胞治疗 骨髓单个核细胞 骨髓间充质干细胞 Random-pattern skin flap Cell therapy Bone marrow mononuclear cells Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Nahabedian MY. Oncoplastic surgery of the breast [M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier Medicine,2009.
  • 2Mathew J, Courtney CA. Symmetrisation procedures in breast reconstruction patients constitute a rising workload in our DGH [J]. Surgeon,2014,12(6):307-309.
  • 3Smith ML, Clarke-Pearson EM, Vornovitsky M, et al. The efficacy of simultaneous breast reconstruction and contralateral balancing procedures in reducing the need for second stage operations [J]. Arch Plast Surg,2014,41(5):535-541.
  • 4Chang EI, Selber JC, Nosrati N, et al. Choosing the optimal timing for contralateral symmetry procedures after unilateral free flap breast reconstruction [J]. Ann Plast Surg,2015,74(1):12-16.
  • 5穆兰花,辛敏强,栾杰.乳腺癌术后乳房重建的研究现状及其评价[J].中华乳腺病杂志(电子版),2011,5(2):49-52. 被引量:29
  • 6Bonomi R, Beta1 D, Rapisarda IF, et al. Role of lipomodelling in improving aesthetic outcomes in patients undergoing immediate and delayed reconstructive breast surgery [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2013,39(10):1039-1045.
  • 7Rizk H, Nkonde C, Cbing RC, et al. Plastic surgical management of the eontralateral breast in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction [J]. Int J Surg,2013,11 (9):767-772.
  • 8Chang El, Lamaris G, Chang DW. Simuhaneous contralateral reduction mammoplasty or mastopexy during unilateral free flap breast reconstruction [J]. Ann Plast Surg,2013,71(2):144-148.
  • 9Huang JJ, Wu CW, Leon LW, et al. Simultaneous eontralateral breast reduction/mastopexy with unilateral breast reconstruction using free abdominal flaps [J]. Ann Plast Surg,2011,67(4):336-342.

二级参考文献24

共引文献28

同被引文献6

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部