期刊文献+

大学评价对高校录取分数排名影响的列联分析 被引量:3

Effect of University Evaluation on Admission Scores Ranking Based on Contingency Table Analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对2008-2012五年间38所"985高校"在武书连和邱均平大学评价中的排名与其在河北省高考录取分数线排名的列联分析,探讨大学评价对高校录取分数排名的影响。大学评价排名与大学录取分数排名存在显著的正相关,即大学排名上升会引起招生质量的提高;大学评价排名对大学录取分数排名的影响会受到招生人数变化的抑制,这种抑制效应会减弱甚至抵消前者对后者的影响;大学评价排名对大学录取分数排名的影响程度对于"名校"而言相对较低。 Through the contingency table analysis of 2008--2012 university ranking and admission scores ranking of 38"985- college"in the university evaluation system of Wu shulian and Qiu junping, the paper investigates the effect of university evaluation on university admission scores ranking. There is a significant positive correlation between university evaluation ranking and university admission scores ranking, showing the rise of university ranking will cause the improvement of new student's quality. The influence of university evaluation on admission scores ranking can be inhibited by the changes in student enrollment, which will weaken or even offset the influence effect of the former on the latter. The influence degree of university evaluation on admission scores ranking is relatively lower to the elite universities.
出处 《华北电力大学学报(社会科学版)》 2015年第2期122-126,共5页 Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences)
基金 2013年河北省社会科学基金项目"大学排名对河北省大学招生就业的影响研究"(项目编号:HB13SH003)
关键词 大学评价 大学排名 录取分数 列联表 university evaluation university ranking admission score contingency table
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献15

  • 1菲力普·G.阿尔特巴赫,周岳峰.大学排行榜之困[J].世界教育信息,2006,19(6):28-29. 被引量:3
  • 2亚历克斯.埃舍尔,马斯莫.萨维诺,王亚敏,侯书栋,李立国.差异的世界:大学排名的全球调查[J].清华大学教育研究,2006,27(5):1-10. 被引量:24
  • 3Terenzini & Pascarella. Living with Myths: Undergraduate Education in America. Change, 1994, Vol. 26( 1 ):28-32.
  • 4Valerie Strauss. U.S. News's College Rankings Face Competition and Criticism. The Washington Post,2007,August 17.
  • 5Ninavan Dyke. Twenty Years of University Report Cards. Higher Education in Europe, 2005, Vol.30 (2): 103-125.
  • 6Maarja Soo & David Dill. The CHE University Ranking in Germany. [ EB/OL ].http://www.unc.edu/ppaq/docs/CHE_formatted.pdf, 2007.
  • 7Gero Federkeil. The Lack of a National Policy Regime of Quality Assurance in Germany Implications and Alternatives. Higher Education Management and Policy, 2003,Vol.15(2):63-72.
  • 8Marijkvander Wende. Ranking and Classification in Higher Education: a European Perspective. Higher Education, 2008, Vol.23: 49-71.
  • 9Detlef Mtiller-Boling. CHE-Ranking Methodology and Presentation [EB/OL].http://www.utwente.nl/cheps/docu- menten/2005rankingmullerboling.pdf, 2005-12-02.
  • 10Kelly Field. Another Accountability Idea: A New Database that Would Customize College Rankings. Chronicle of Higher Education, 2006, March 31.

共引文献20

同被引文献22

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部