期刊文献+

基于QFD及粗糙集的保障能力需求满足度评价方法 被引量:6

An Approach for Support Capability Requirement Satisfactory Degree Evaluation Based on QFD and Rough Set Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对传统能力评价中指标及其权重的确定具有不一致性和不确定性特点,提出了一种以保障能力需求满足度为依据的评价方法。利用由保障能力-保障性能-保障特性映射的质量屋信息,按照构建质量屋的反方向将保障特性满足度转化为保障能力满足度。为了有效处理模糊和不确定的保障特性评价信息,采用粗糙集理论将评价数据表达为粗糙数形式。最后举例验证了方法的有效性。 To deal with the problem that determination of evaluation indices and their weights or preferences is inconsistent and uncertain in capability evaluation,a method is proposed based on the satisfaction degree of support capability requirements. Using the mapping information in house of quality(HoQ)from support capability to support performance to support characteristics,the satisfaction degree of each support characteristics is transformed into the satisfaction degree of each support capability in the opposite direction of constructing HoQ. To deal with imprecise and fuzzy evaluating information of support characteristics,evaluation data are expressed as rough numbers by means of rough set theory. A case is presented to illustrate effectiveness of the proposed method.
出处 《火力与指挥控制》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期136-139,143,共5页 Fire Control & Command Control
关键词 QFD 粗糙集 保障能力 满足度 QFD rough set theory support capability satisfactory degree
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献55

  • 1唐加福,张艳娥,陈以增.供应商参与下的产品部件设计方案选择模型[J].计算机集成制造系统,2005,11(5):619-624. 被引量:16
  • 2Mullur A A, Mattson C A,Messac A. Pitfalls of the typical construction of decision matrices for concept selection[C]//Proeeedings of the 41st Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit. Reno:AIAA,2003.
  • 3Ayag Z. An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment[J].International Journal of Production Research,2005,43(4) : 687-713.
  • 4Chen H H, Lee A H,Tong Y H. Prioritization and operations NPD mix in a network with strategic partners under uncertainty[J]. Expert Systems with Ap- plications, 2007, 33(2): 337-346.
  • 5Kahraman C, Buyukozkan G, Ates N Y. A two phase multi-attribute decision making approach for new product introduction [J].Information Sciences, 2007, 177:1567-1582.
  • 6Buyukozkan G, Feyzioglu O. A fuzzy-logic-based decision-making approach for new product development[J].Int J Production Economics, 2004, 90(1) :27-45.
  • 7Chan L K, Wu M L. A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example [J]. Omega, 2005, 33(1) :119-139.
  • 8Mikhailov L. Deriving priorities from fuzzy pair wise comparison judgments [J].Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003(134) :365-385.
  • 9Pawlak Z. A rough set view on rayes' theorem[-J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2003, 18 (5) :487-498.
  • 10Zhai L Y, Zhong L P,Zhong Z W. A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment [J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology,2007,37(5) : 613-624.

共引文献72

同被引文献50

引证文献6

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部