认知语言学的“文化转向” 被引量：1

The " Cultural Turn" in Cognitive Linguistics

下载PDF

导出

摘要认知语言学的发展呈现出失衡迹象,主要表现为重体验性、轻文化性;重个体性、轻社会性;重普遍性、轻差异性;重共时性、轻历时性。其根本原因在于对语言的文化维度重视度不够。在后现代主义思潮下,"文化"越来越受到学者们的重视,结合语言与文化的关系以及认知语言学自身的不足,本文认为认知语言学未来的发展方向应该结合"语言、文化、认知"三者的研究,由此提出认知语言学的"文化转向"。 Cognitive linguistics exerts an imbalance in theory development, which is mainly characterized with more emphasis on embodiment but less on cuhure, more on individuality but less on sociality, more on universality but less on difference, more on synchronicity but less on diachronicity. The basic reason lies in the inadequate emphasis on cultural dimension. With the ideological trend of post - modernism, scholars are attaching more and more importance to ＂ culture＂. Given the close relationship between language and culture and the defect of cognitive linguistics, this paper states that the future study of cognitive linguistics will be a study of ＂ language, culture and cognition＂, and Buts forward the＂ culture turn＂ in cognitive linguistics.

作者冯军

机构地区四川外国语大学

出处《四川民族学院学报》 2015年第2期82-88,共7页 Journal of Sichuan Minzu College

基金 2014年重庆市研究生科研创新项目--"文化语言的认知拓展"阶段性研究成果项目编号:CYS14179

关键词认知语言学认知文化社会 cognitive linguistics cognition culture society

分类号 H0-05 [语言文字—语言学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献26

1Zunshine, Lisa (ed.) Introduction to cognitive cultural studies [ M ]. JHU Press, 2010.
2Yamaguchi, Masataka, Dennis Tay, and Benjamin Blount (eds.) Approaches to Language, Culture, and Cognition: The Intersection of Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Anthropology [ M]. Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
3Borofsky, R. On the knowledge of knowing of cultural activities, in R. Borofsky (ed.) Assessing Cultural Anthropology [ M], New York: McGraw -Hill, 1994.
4Palmer, Gary B. Energy through fusion at last: Synergies in cognitive anthropology and cognitive Linguistics [ A ]. G. Kristiansen and R. Dirven ( eds. ) Cognitive Linguistics : Foundations and Fields of Application [ C ]. Berlin/New York : Mouton de Gruyter, 2006.
5Clark A, Chalmers D. The extended mind [J]. Analysis 58, 1998:pl0 - 23.
6Sutton J. Introduction: memory, embod- ied cognition, and the extended mind [ J]. Philosophical Psychology, 2006, 19 (3) : p281 -289.
7Sutton J. Memory and the ex- tended mind : embodiment, cognition, and culture [ J ]. Cognitive processing, 2005, 6 (4) : p223 - 226.
8Wilson R A. Collec- tive memory, group minds, and the extended mind thesis [J]. Cognitive processing, 2005, 6 (4) : 227 -236.
9D. Geeraerts, Ten Lectures on Cognitive Sociolingnistics. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press, 2010.
10Sandra Handl & Hans - Jorg Schmid, Introduction, in Sandra Handl &Hans - Jorg Schmid ( eds. ), Windows to the Mind : Metaphor, Metonymy and Conceptual Blending [ M ]. Berlin / New York : De Gruyter Mouton, 2011.

二级参考文献116

1方经民.汉语空间方位参照的认知结构[J].世界汉语教学,1999,13(4):32-38. 被引量：68
2戴浩一,叶蜚声.以认知为基础的汉语功能语法刍议(上)[J].当代语言学,1990(4):21-27. 被引量：162
3王寅.语言的体验性——从体验哲学和认知语言学看语言体验观[J].外语教学与研究,2005,37(1):37-43. 被引量：227
4Harder, P. The Platonic projection and the social turn in Cognitive Linguistics [ R ]. Paper presented at the Conference on Language, Communication and Cognition, University of Brighton, UK, August 4th-7th, 2008.
5Langacker, R. W. Grammar and Conceptualization [ M ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.
6Harder, P. Partial autonomy. Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics [ A]. T. Janssen & G. Redeker. Methodology [ C ]. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999. 195 -222.
7Croft, W.& D. A. Cruse. Cognitive Linguistics [M]. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press,2004.
8Geeraerts, D. & H. Cuyckens. Introducing Cognitive Linguistics [ A ]. D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive linguistics [ C ]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 21307.3-21.
9Holland, D. & N. Quinn. Cultural Models in Language and Thought [ C ]. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
10Lakoff, G. Moral Politics: What Conservatives Know That Liberals Don' t [ M ]. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1996.