期刊文献+

脊髓损伤单丝检查与轻触觉检查结果比较 被引量:4

Comparison between Monofilament Test and Light Touch Exam for Spinal Cord Injury
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查法与国际标准的脊髓损伤轻触觉检查法的相关性。方法住院脊髓损伤患者84例,分别采用Semmes-Weinstein单丝检查法与国际标准的脊髓损伤轻触觉检查法判断损伤平面,按身体左侧和右侧分别记录检查结果。结果以单侧正常轻触觉平面计算,两种方法的一致率为36%。对于脊髓损伤残损分级A级患者,采用单丝检查法检查,损伤平面以下感觉关键点71%触觉消失,采用国际标准轻触觉检查法84%消失。结论脊髓损伤单丝检查与轻触觉检查的一致率较低,可能与脊髓损伤后触觉敏化有关。建议在临床上联合应用两种检查方法。 Objective To investigate the correlation between Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test and light touch exam of international standard for spinal cord injury(SCI). Methods 84 inpatients with SCI were assessed with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test and light touch exam of international standard to determine the SCI level. The results were recorded as right-side and left-side of the body respectively. Results The normal tactual level of monofilament test and the normal light touch level of International Standard of Spinal Cord Injury(ISSCI) was consistent in 36% result to the unilateral level of SCI. For the 45 cases with ASIA A injury, 71% of the key points below the SCI level lost the tactual sensation in monofilament test, and 84% lost in light touch exam of ISSCI. Conclusion The result of monofilament test is poorly consistent with light touch exam of SCI, which may result from tactile sensitization after SCI. It is recommended to combine these exam in practices.
出处 《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期453-456,共4页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice
关键词 脊髓损伤 单丝检查 轻触觉 损伤平面 触觉敏化 康复 spinal cord injury monofilament test light touch injured level tactile sensitization rehabilitation
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Vasquez N, Gall A, Ellaway PH, et al. Light touch and pin prick disparity in the International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) [J]. Spinal Cord, 2013, 51(5): 375-378.
  • 2Semmes J, Weinstein S, Ghent L, et al. Performance on com- plex tactual tasks after brain injury in man: analyses by locus of lesion [J]. Am J Psychol, 1954, 67(2): 220-240.
  • 3Lee S, Kim H, Choi S, et al. Clinical usefulness of the two-site Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test for detecting diabetic pe- ripheral neuropathy [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2003, 18(1): 103-107.
  • 4Smieja M, Hunt DL, Edelman D, et al. Clinical examination for detection of protective sensation in the feet of diabetic pa- tients [J]. J Gen Intern Med, 1999, 14(7): 418-424.
  • 5Shin JB, Seong YJ, Lee HJ, et al. Foot screening technique in a diabetic population [J]. J Korean Med Sci, 2000, 15(1): 78-82.
  • 6Wu SC, Driver VR, Wrobel JS, et al. Foot ulcers in the diabetic patient, prevention and treatment [J]. Vascul Health Risk Man- ag, 2007, 3(1): 65-76.
  • 7Holeweski JJ, Stess RM, Graf PM, et al. A esthesiometry: Quantification of cutaneous pressure sensation in diabetic pe- ripheral neuropathy [J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 1988, 25(2): 1-10.
  • 8Kumar S, Fernando D J, Veves A, et al. Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments: a simple, effective and inexpensive screening device for identifying diabetic patients at risk of foot ulcer- ation [J]. Diabetes Res Clin Pract, 1991, 13(1-2): 63-67.
  • 9Ellaway PH, Catley M. Reliability of the electrical perceptual threshold and Semmes-Weinstein monofilament tests of cutane- ous sensibility [J]. Spinal Cord, 2013, 51(2): 120-125.
  • 10Velstra IM, Bolliger M, Baumberger M, et al. Epicritic sensa- tion in cervical spinal cord injury: diagnostic gains beyond test- ing light touch [J]. J Neurotrauma, 2013, 30(15): 1342-1348.

二级参考文献24

  • 1Marchand F, Tsantoulas C, Singh D, et al. Effects of Etanercept and Minocycline in a rat model of spinal cord injury [J]. Eur J Pain, 2009,13(7):673-681.
  • 2Delavallee M, Abu-Serieh B, de Tourchaninoff M, et al. Subdural motor cortex stimulation for central and peripheral neu- ropathie pain: a long-term follow-up study in series of eight patients[J]. Neurosurgery, 2008,63(1):101-108.
  • 3Moseley GL. Using visual illusion to reduce at-level neuropathic pain in paraplegia[J]. Pain, 2007,130(3):294-298.
  • 4Norrbrink BC, Kowalski J, Lundeberg T. A comprehensive pain management programme comprising educational, cogni- tive and behavioural interventions for neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury[J]. J Rehabil Med, 2006,38(3):172- 180.
  • 5Biering-Sorensen F, Pedersen V, Clausen S. Epidemiology of spinal cord lesions in Denmark[J]. Paraplegia, 1990,28(2): 105 118.
  • 6Defrin R, Ohry A, Blumen N, et al. Characterization of chronic pain and somatosensory function in spinal cord injury subjects[J]. Pain, 2001,89(3):253-263.
  • 7Cruz-Almeida Y, Martinez-Arizala A, Widerstro EG. Chronicity of pain associated with spinal cord injury: A longitudinal analysis[J]. J Rehabil Res Dev, 2005(4),42:585-594.
  • 8Hains BC, Waxman SG. Activated microglia contribute to the maintenance of chronic pain after spinal cord injury[J]. J Neu- rosci, 2006,26( 16):4308-4317.
  • 9Hari AR, Wvdenkeller S, Dokladal P, et al. Enhanced recovery of human spinothalamic function is associated with cen- tral neuropathic pain after SCI[J]. Exp Neurol, 2009,216(2): 428-430.
  • 10Kalous A, Osborne PB, Keast JR. Spinal cord compression injury in adult rats initiates changes in dorsal horn remodeling that may correlate with development of neuropathic pain[J]. J Comp Neurol, 2009,513(6):668-684.

共引文献35

同被引文献23

引证文献4

二级引证文献25

;
使用帮助 返回顶部