期刊文献+

不同变量问卷表在结直肠癌早诊早治筛查中的效果评价 被引量:5

The Effect of Variables Questionnaire in Screening for Colorectal Cancer Early Diagnosis and Treatment
原文传递
导出
摘要 [目的]评价两种不同变量问卷调查表在结直肠癌筛查中的效果,为进一步优化筛查方案提供科学依据。[方法]根据《中国癌症筛查及早诊早治指南》制订结直肠癌筛查实施方案,对海宁市40~74岁目标人群开展筛查。初筛包括流行病学问卷调查和大便隐血试验(FOBT)确定高危人群,其中部分应检对象采用新版问卷调查表,即在原病史问卷内容的基础上增加了腹痛、贫血、大便习惯性质改变和不明原因体重减轻4个变量。精筛即对高危人群进一步做电子结肠镜检查。[结果]海宁市2010~2012年完成流行病学问卷调查240 177人,顺应率88.25%。采用新版病史问卷调查91 997人,病史阳性率为6.99%;检出肠道病变(息肉、腺瘤、癌)2369例。病史阳性诊断肠道病变的灵敏度为47.24%,特异性为71.71%。旧版病史问卷调查148 180例,病史阳性率为5.54%,检出肠道病变4183例,病史阳性诊断肠道病变的灵敏度为38.90%,特异性为69.37%。[结论]新版问卷调查表病史阳性率高、对肠道病变灵敏度、特异性均高于旧版,在进行结直肠癌筛查时新版问卷调查表值得推荐。 [Purpose] To investigate the effect of new and old version of history questionnaire for colorectal cancer screening,and to provide the scientific basis for the further optimization of the screening program. [ Methods ] Based on the China Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis and Early Treatment for Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines,target population with 40-74 years-old in Haining city were carried out screening,including epidemiological survey and fecal occult blood test(FOBT) to identify high-risk populations. New questionnaire increased 4 variables including ab- dominal pain, anemia, defecated changes, unexplained weight loss. Fine screen for high-risk groups underwent further electronic colonoscopy. [Results] A total of 240 177 people completed the epi- demiological survey with rate of 88.25% in Haining city from 2010 to 2012. Of 91 997 people with new version questionnaire,the positive medical history was 6.99%;and 2369 people were checked out the intestinal lesions (polyp,adenoma, carcinoma). The medical history diagnosed intestinal le- sions with a sensitivity of 47.24% and a specificity of 71.71%. Of 148 180 people with old version questionnaire, the positive medical history was 5.54%, and 4183 people were checked out the in- testinal lesions. The medical history diagnosed intestinal lesions with a sensitivity of 38.90% and a specificity of 69.37%. [Conclusion] The new version questionnaire has a higher detected rate of medical history,and a higher sensitivity and specificity than the old version questionnaire for diag- nosing intestinal lesions. The new version of the questionnaire is recommended for screening for colorectal cancer.
出处 《中国肿瘤》 CAS 2015年第5期380-384,共5页 China Cancer
基金 浙江省公益性技术应用项目研究(2013C33127)
关键词 结直肠癌 筛查 病史 问卷调查 灵敏度 特异性 colorectal cancer screening history questionnaire sensitivity specificity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献48

  • 1张思维,雷正龙,李光琳,邹小农,陈万青,赵平.中国肿瘤登记地区2005年发病死亡资料分析[J].中国肿瘤,2009,18(12):973-979. 被引量:32
  • 2陈竺.全国第三次死因回顾抽样调查报告[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2008:11-12.
  • 3Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I : comparability, validity and timeliness [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45: 747-755.
  • 4Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, et al. Cancer incidence in five continents, Vol. IX. IARC scientific: publications No. 160[M], Lyon: IARC, 2007.
  • 5Parkin DM, Chen VM, Ferlay J, et al. Comparability and quality control in cancer registration. IARC technical report No.19[M]. Lyon: IARC, 1994.
  • 6Felay J, Bnrkhard C, Whelan S, et al. Check and conversion programs for cancerregistries. IARC Technical Report No. 42[M]. Lyon: IARC, 2005.
  • 7Felay J. The IARCcrgTools program [EB/OL]. http://www.iacr.com.fr/iarccrgtools.htm, 2006.
  • 8赵平,陈万青.2008年中国肿瘤登记年报[M].第1版.北京:军事医学科学出版社,2009.88-89.
  • 9Bray F, Parkin DM, Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: Principles and methods. Part I : Comparability, validity and timeliness [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009, 45(5): 747-755.
  • 10Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR et al. Cancer incidence in five conti- nents, Vol. IX. IARC scientific publications No. 160[M]. Lyon: IARC, 2007.

共引文献1616

同被引文献51

引证文献5

二级引证文献45

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部