1Sharma A.Managerial interpretation and organizationalcontext as predictors of corporatechoice of environmental strategy.Academy ofManagement Journal,2000,(43):681-697.
2Peter G.Sassone,Michael V.Martucci.Industrialenergy conservation: The reasons behindthe decisions.Energy,1984,9(5):427-437.
3Stephen J.Decanio & William E.Watkins,Investment In Energy Efficiency: Do The CharacteristicsOf Firms Matter-, The Review ofEconomics and Statistics,1998,(80):95-107.
4DeCanio S J.The efficiency paradox: bureaucraticand organizational barriers to profitableenergy-saving investment.Energy Policy,1998,26(5):441-454.
5Henri de Groot & Verhoef, Erik T.& Nijkamp,Peter,Energy saving by firms: decisionmaking,barriers and policies, Energy Economics,Elsevier,2001,23(6):717-740.
4Andrews-Speed P. China's ongoing energy efficiency drive: origins, progress and prospects. Energy Policy,2009, 37(4) : 1331-1344.
5Shi L, Xing L, Lu G F, et al. Evaluation of rational industrial solid waste abatement in China. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2005, 35 ( 1 ) : 42-57.
6Wang G H, Wang Y X, Zhao T. Analysis of interactions among the barriers to energy saving in China. Energy Policy, 2008, 36(6): 1879-1889.
7Fang Y P, Zeng Y. Balancing energy and environment: the effect and perspective of management instruments in China. Energy, 2007, 32(12): 2247-2261.
9Meyer, J. W., and W. R. Scott.,1983,Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality,Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10Milstein Mark,Stuart L Hart and Anne S York.,2001, "Coercion Breeds Variation: The Differential Impact of Isomorphic Pressures on Environmental Strategies"In Andrew Hoffman and Marc Ventresca, eds., Organizations, Policy, and the Natural Environment: Institutional and Strategic Perspectives, Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
