期刊文献+

民族志中的“田野”——论民族志对“田野”的建构

On the Construction of the “Filed” in Ethnography
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在从"摇椅上的人类学家"到"走向田野的人类学家"的研究范式转换过程中,科学民族志写作方式的建立起到了革命性的作用,而对民族志科学性争论却也伴随而生。以马林诺夫斯基《西太平洋上的航海者》为基础,分析民族志对"田野"的塑造过程,认为民族志反映的只能是田野调查地文化的一个侧面,并不是其所声称的"文化再现"。 The established writing style of scientific ethnography played a revolutionary role, on the conversion process of research paradigm between"the armchair's anthropologist" and "went into the fields of anthropologists". At the same time, the debate of the scien- tificalness of ethnography was also appeared. The paper attempts to analyze the process of the "filed " in the shape of ethnography, based on the Argonauts of the Western Pacific, and holds that the ethnography reflects only one side to the culture, not its the alleged "cultural reproduction".
作者 朱卿
出处 《柳州师专学报》 2015年第1期1-4,共4页 Journal of Liuzhou Teachers College
关键词 田野调查 民族志 科学性 field work ethnography scientific
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献76

  • 1刘中一.田野工作资料收集的若干问题[J].湖北民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2006,24(5):25-29. 被引量:6
  • 2德里达.《声音与现象:胡塞尔现象学中的符号问题导论》,北京:商务印书馆,1999年,第3页.
  • 3William James, The Principle of Psychology (New York: Dover Publication, 1959, vol. Ⅱ ) 291.
  • 4Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge Mass: Harvard UniversityPress, 1989).
  • 5William Ralph Shroeder, Continental Philosophy: A Critical Approach (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004) 456.
  • 6Norbert Wiley, The Serrdatic Self (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995) 26.
  • 7Fernando Andacht, "A Semiotic Reflection on Selfinterpretation and Identity", Theor3 and Psychology, vol. 15, no I (2005) 51-75.
  • 8Harold Garfinkel 理论,见Norbert Wiley, The Semiotic Self, 81.
  • 9Jacques Lacan, The Language of the Self (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1968) 62-63.
  • 10T. F. Hoad (ed), The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Word Origins (London: Guild Publishing, 1986) 469.

共引文献225

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部