不同日志记录方式对大学生情绪体验的影响

The effect of diary method on daily affect of college students

目的 探索不同日志记录方式对情绪体验的影响.方法 将75名大学生随机分配到信息记录组、感受记录组和对照组,在干预前、干预后及两个月的追踪期后对被试施以贝克抑郁量表（BDI）以及积极情绪和消极情绪量表（PANAS）评定.结果 对积极情绪的方差分析结果表明,时间主效应不显著（P＞0.05）,组别[（2.76±0.41）分,（2.97±0.50）分,（3.24±0.45）分]主效应显著（P＜0.05）,时间段x组别交互作用显著（P＜0.05）,简单效应分析表明干预后信息记录组[（2.47±0.62）分]和感受记录组[（2.86±0.64）分]的积极情绪均显著低于对照组[（3.35±0.46）分]（P＜0.05）;消极情绪的时间主效应、组别主效应及交互作用均差异无统计学意义（P＞0.05）;抑郁水平[（8.02±5.65）分,（5.38±5.04）分,（5.20±5.51）分]的时间主效应显著（P＜0.01）,组别主效应和交互作用都不显著（P＞0.05）.结论 不同的日志记录法对被试的情绪体验有不同的影响.

Objective To explore the effect of different diary method on daily affect of college students.Methods 75 numbers of under-graduates were randomly assigned into information recording group,feeling recording group and control group.Beck Depression Inventory （BDI） and Positive And Negative Affect Scale （PANAS） were used before and after two months intervention.Results For positive emotion,ANOVA results showed no significant （P〉0.05） main effect of time,a significant （P〈0.05） main effect of group（2.76±0.41,2.97±0.50,3.24±0.45）,and the timexgroup had a significant interaction （P〈0.05）.Simple effect analysis showed that after the intervention,the positive emotions of information recording group （2.47 ± 0.62） and feeling recording group （2.86±0.64） was lower than the positive emotions of control group（3.35±0.46） significantly（P〈0.05）.For negative emotions,there was no significant difference （P〉0.05） in main effects of time,group and interaction;for depression,the main effect of the level of time （8.02± 5.65,5.38 ± 5.04,5.20± 5.51） was significant （P〈 0.01）,and main effect of group and the interaction were not significant（P〉0.05）.Conclusion Different diary methods have different effects on the subject＇s daily affect.