期刊文献+

残疾人社会融合自评量表的初步编制及信度效度分析 被引量:4

Development of the social integration self-rating scale and the reliability, validity analysis of the disabled people
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 编制残疾人社会融合自评量表,并检验其信度和效度.方法 采用自编残疾人社会融合量表和正负性情绪量表对511名残疾人进行测评.结果 残疾人社会融合量表分为3个维度:自我融合、关系融合和情感融合,共解释47.39%的变异量.每个维度有2-3个子因素;理论模型拟合能被接受(CMIN/DF=2.051,P<0.01;RMSEA=0.046;GFI=0.884;CFI=0.926;IFI=0.927);社会融合各维度与正、负性情绪均存在极显著相关(正性情绪:r=0.34-0.55,P<0.01;负性情绪:r=-0.12--0.32,P<0.01),社会融合高低分两组在正性情绪和负性情绪上得分差异有统计学意义(正性情绪:t=13.77,P<0.01;负性情绪:£=-7.58,P<0.01);量表及其三个维度的Cronbach'sα系数分别为0.94,0.92,0.87,0.89,7个子因素的Cronbach's α系数在0.76- 0.87之间.结论 残疾人社会融合理论建构多层次、多维度,量表信度、效度良好,可评估残疾人的社会融合程度. Objective To develop social integration scale of the disabled,and to test the reliability and validity of the scale.Methods 511 disabled persons were investigated by self-made social integration scale and Chinese version of positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS-C).Results The Scale was composed of three factors:self integration,relationship integration and affection integration,and they explained 47.39% of variance.The theoretical model fit could be accepted (x2/df =2.051,P〈0.001;RMSEA =0.046;GFI =0.884;CFI =0.926;IFI =0.927).The factors had significant correlated with positive affect (r=0.34-0.55,P〈0.01)and positive affect (r=-0.12--0.32,P〈0.01).The high score group and low score group of social integration had significant differences in positive affect (t=13.77,P〈0.01)and negative affect(t=-7.58,P〈0.01).The cronbach's alpha coefficients of the scale and the three factors were 0.94,0.92,0.87 and 0.89 respectively,and the seven sub-factors'cronbach 's alpha coefficients were from 0.76 to 0.87.Conclusion The theory construct of social integration of the disabled is multi-hierarchical and multi-dimensional.The scale has acceptable reliability and validity,and can be used to assess the degree of social integration of the disabled.
出处 《中华行为医学与脑科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期270-272,共3页 Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medicine and Brain Science
基金 四川省哲学社会科学十二五规划项目(SC12E054) 大学生创新实验计划项目(CXXS201314)
关键词 残疾人 社会融合 信度 效度 The Disabled people Social integration Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1吴文彦,厉才茂.社会融合:残疾人实现平等权利和共享发展的唯一途径[J].残疾人研究,2012(3):34-42. 被引量:38
  • 2Agota S. Social integration of children with mild intellectual disabili- ties in the primary, school [ J 1. Soc Behav Sci, 2014,116 : 1855-1860.
  • 3Ware NC,Hopper K,Tugenberg T. et al.A theory of social integration as quality of life [ J ]. Psych Serv, 2008,59 ( 1 ) : 27-33.
  • 4Riches VC, Green VA. Social integration in the workplace for people with disabilities: an Australian perspective [ J ] J Vocat Rehabil, 2003,19(3) : 127-142.
  • 5Kasinska K. Good and bad sides of social integration of disabled people [ J ]. New Edu Rev, 2007,11 ( 1 ) : 147-148.
  • 6赵康,罗泮,刘林.农村残疾人社会融合研究[J].安徽农业科学,2008,36(13):5624-5625. 被引量:4
  • 7Wu LH, Qiu ZY, Wong D, et al. The research on the status, rehabilita- tion, education, vocational development, social integration and support services related to intellectual disability in China [ J ]. Res Dev Dis- abil,2010,31 (6) :1216-1222.
  • 8RobinsonJP,ShaverPR,WrightsmanLS.性格与社会心理测量总览(下):信念、态度及特质篇[M].杨宜音,张志学,译.台湾:远流出版公司,1997:261-477.
  • 9Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect:the PANAS scales [ J 1. J Pers Soc Psy, 1988,54 (6) : 1063-10701.
  • 10黄丽,杨廷忠,季忠民.正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2003,17(1):54-56. 被引量:589

二级参考文献13

共引文献649

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部