期刊文献+

颈动脉狭窄患者介入治疗后复发脑卒中的临床分析

Clinical Analysis of Stroke Recurrence After Interventional Treatment for Carotid Artery Stenosis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:分析颈动脉狭窄患者介入治疗后复发脑卒中的情况。方法收集2011年1月~2013年12月间我院收治的颈动脉狭窄患者临床资料,按照治疗方案分为药物组(42例)和介入组(56例),随访1~2年观察比较两组治疗后脑卒中复发情况。结果随访1~2年,介入组复发脑卒中7.14%、多发脑梗死3.57%、TIA0.0%,明显低于药物组28.57%、19.05%、11.90%,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论介入治疗颈动脉狭窄可有效预防脑卒中,改善患者预后。 Objective To analyze the characteristics of recurrent stroke in patients with carotid artery stenosis after interventional therapy. Methods The clinical data of patients with carotid artery stenosis from 2011 January to 2013 December in our hospital treated according to the treatment plan, divided into drug group (42 cases) and intervention group (56 cases), followed up for 1~2 years were compared between the two groups of treatment of cerebral stroke recurrence. Results The patients were followed up for 1~2 years, the intervention group the recurrence of stroke in 7.14%, multiple cerebral infarction in 3.57%, TIA0.0%, significantly lower than the medication group of 28.57%, 19.05%, 11.90%, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion Interventional treatment for carotid artery stenosis can be effective in preventing stroke, improve the prognosis of the patients.
作者 姚文林
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第9期65-65,共1页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 颈动脉狭窄 介入治疗 复发脑卒中 Carotid artery stenosis Interventional therapy Recurrence of stroke
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献127

  • 1王嗣欣,周丽红,王芳芳,赵亮,高燕军,米艳娟,陈启东.炎性因子在颅内外血管狭窄支架成型术后再狭窄中的作用[J].承德医学院学报,2007,24(2):179-182. 被引量:4
  • 2Mantese VA,Timaran CH,Chiu D, et al. The carotid revascu- larization endarterectomy versus stenting trial(CREST) :stent- ing versus carotid endarterectomyfor carotid disease. Stroke, 2010,41 : S31-S34.
  • 3Sacco RL, Adams R, Albers G, et al. Guidelines for prevention of stroke in patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack : a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Council on Stroke: cosponsored by the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: the American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline. Stroke, 2006,37:577-617.
  • 4Levy EI, Mocco J, Samuelson RM, et al. Optimal treatment of carotid artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008,51 : 979-985.
  • 5Mas JL, Trinquart L, Leys D, et al. EVA-3S investigators. Endarterectomy versus angioplasty in patients with symptom- atic severe carotid stenosis (EVA-3S) trial: results up to 4 years from a randomised, multicentre trial. Lancet Neurol, 2008,7 : 885-892.
  • 6Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Bruckmann H, et al. 30-day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet, 2006,368 : 1239-3.247.
  • 7Kastrup A,Groschel K,Schnaudigel S,et al. Target lesion ul ceration and arch calcification are associated with increased in cidence of carotid stenting-associated ischernic lesions in octo genarians. J Vasc Surg, 2008,47 : 88-95.
  • 8Sayeed S, Stanziale SF, Wholey MH, et al. Angiographic lesion characteristics can predict adverse outcomes after carotid artery stenting. J Vase Surg, 2008,47 :81-87.
  • 9Kurre W, Berkefeld J, Brassel F, et al. for the INTRASTENT Study Group. In-hospital complication rates after stent treatment of 388 symptomatic intracranial stenoses:results from the INTRASTENT multicentric registry. Stroke, 2010, 41: 494- 498.
  • 10Veith FJ, Amor M, Ohki T,et al.Current status of carotid bifurcationangioplasty and stenting based on a consensus of opinion leaders[J].J Vase Surg,2001,33(2 Suppl):Slll-116.

共引文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部