期刊文献+

企业位构与创新类型:网络特征调节下的分析 被引量:3

Enterprise Construction and Innovation Types: The Moderating Effects of Network Characteristic
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于467家企业及其相应网络组成的样本,采用逻辑回归研究企业的网络中心性和研发结构与创新类型的关系,并探讨企业所在网络密度和联结强度对两者关系的调节作用。结果显示:具有更高网络中心性和具有中心式研发结构的企业倾向于进行探索式创新,具有较低网络中心性和具有分布式研发结构的企业则进行利用式创新;网络密度负向调节企业的网络中心性和探索式创新的关系,正向调节企业的网络中心性和利用式创新的关系;联结强度正向调节企业的网络中心性和探索式创新的关系,负向调节企业的网络中心性和利用式创新的关系;网络密度和联结强度负向调节中心式研发结构和探索式创新的关系,正向调节分布式研发结构和利用式创新的关系。 Using a sample of 467 Chinese enterprises and their corresponding network, this article applies the Lo- gistic regression to analyze the relationship among the network centrality of enterprise, R&D process structure and innovation types, whereby to analyze the moderating effects of network density and tie strength on the relation- ship between the two. The results show that: (1) A enterprise with higher network centrality and centralized R&D process structure tends to carry out exploration innovation, a enterprise with lower network centrality and decentra- lized R&D process structure tends to carry out exploitation innovation; (2) Network density negatively moderate the relationship between network centrality of enterprise and exploration innovation, positively moderate the relation- ship between network centrality of enterprise and exploitation innovation; (3) Tie strength positively moderate the relationship between network centrality of enterprise and exploration innovation, negatively moderate the relation- ship between network centrality of enterprise and exploitation innovation; (4) Network density and tie strength nega- tively moderate the relationship between centralized R&D structure and exploration innovation, positively moderate the relationship between decentralized R&D process structure and exploitation innovation.
出处 《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期115-125,共11页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71172200) 国家社会科学基金项目(13XGL004) 陕西省教育厅科学研究计划项目(11JK0165) 陕西省重点学科建设专项
关键词 企业网络中心性 研发结构 创新类型 网络密度 联结强度 network centrality of enterprise R&D process structure innovation types network density tie strength
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Denrel J, March J G. Adaptation as information restric- tion: The hot stove effect[J]. Organization Science, 2001,12(5):523-538.
  • 2Gupta A K, Smith K G, Shalley C E. The interplay be- tween exploration and exploitation[J]. Academy of Ma- nagement Journal, 2006,49(4):693-706.
  • 3Nicolai J F, Lyngsie J, Zahra S A. The role of exter- nal knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of opportunity exploitation[J]. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 2013,34(12):1453-1471.
  • 4Allan A. Are network effects really all about size? The role of structure and conduct[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2013,1002(10): 1-41.
  • 5Ter Wal A J, Boschma R. Co-evolution of firms, indus- tries and networks in space[J]. Regional Studies, 2011, 45(7):919-933.
  • 6Blindenbach D F, Ende J. The locus of innovation: The effect of a separate innovation unit on explora- tion, exploitation, and ambidexterity in manufacturing and service firms[J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2014,31(5): 1-17.
  • 7彭新敏.企业网络与利用性-探索性学习的关系研究:基于创新视角[J].科研管理,2011,32(3):15-22. 被引量:22
  • 8Stettner U, Lavie D. Ambidexterity under scrutiny: Ex- ploration and exploitation via internal organization, al- liances, and acquisitions[J]. Strategic Management Jour- nal, 2014,35(13):1903-1929.
  • 9Gilsing V, Nooteboom B, Vanhaverbeke W, et al. Net- work embedde&less and the exploration of novel tech- nologies: Technological distance, betweenness centrality and density[J]. Research Policy, 2008,37(10):1717-1731.
  • 10Arora A, Belenzon S, Rios L A. Make, buy, organize: The !nterplay between research, external knowledge, and firm structure[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2014,35(3):317-337.

二级参考文献115

  • 1薛云奎,齐大庆,韦华宁.中国企业战略执行现状及执行力决定因素分析[J].管理世界,2005,21(9):88-98. 被引量:94
  • 2贺小刚,李新春,方海鹰.动态能力的测量与功效:基于中国经验的实证研究[J].管理世界,2006,22(3):94-103. 被引量:194
  • 3Teece, D. J., et al.. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509-533.
  • 4Helfat, C. E., et al.. Dynamic Capabilities: Understanding Strategic Change in Organizations. Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
  • 5Menon, A. G.. Revisiting Dynamic Capability. IIMB Management Review, 2008, 20(1): 22-33.
  • 6Teece, D. J,. Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The Nature and Microfoundations of (Sustainable) Enterprise Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 2007, 28(13): 1319-1350.
  • 7Zollo, M., Winter, S. G.. Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities. Organization Science, 2002, 13(3): 339-358.
  • 8Zott, C.. Dynamic Capabilities and the Emergence of Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance: Insights from a Simulation Study. Strategic Management Journal, 2003, 24(2): 97-112.
  • 9Eisenhardt, K. M., Martin, J. A., Dynamic Capabilities: What are They. Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10/11): 1105-1121.
  • 10Wang, C. L., Ahmed, P. K.. Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2007, 9(1): 31-51.

共引文献120

同被引文献63

  • 1Collins C J, Clark K D. Strategic human resource prac- tices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage[J]. Acade- my of Management Journal, 2003,46(6):740-751.
  • 2Flawer J H, Christakis N A. Cooperative behabior cas- cades in human social networks[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2010,107(12):5334-5338.
  • 3Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administra- tive Science Quarterly, 1997,42(1):35-67.
  • 4Butt R S. Structural holes and good ideas[J]. American Journal of Sociology, 2004,110(2):349-399.
  • 5Reagans R, McEvily B. Network structure and know- ledge transfer: The effect of cohesion and range[J]. Ad- ministrative Science Quarterly, 2003,48(2):240-267.
  • 6Peng T Q, Wang z Z. Network closure, brokerage, and structural influence of journals: A longitudinal study of journal citation network in intemet research (2000-2010)[J]. Scientometrics, 2013,97(3):675-693.
  • 7Wang J C, Chiang C H, Lin S W. Network structure of innovation: Can brokerage or closure predict patent family?[J]. Scientometrics, 2010(84):735-748.
  • 8Clarkson G. Patent Informatics for Patent Thicket De- tection: A Network Analytic Approach for Measuring the Density of Patent Space[R]. Working Paper, Uni- versity of Michigan, 2005.
  • 9Chang S B, Lai K K, Chang S M. Exploring techno- logy diffusion and classification of business methods: Using the patent citation network[J]. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 2008,76(1):107-117.
  • 10Kim H, Song J. Social network analysis of patent in- fringement lawsuits[J]. Technological Forecasting & So- cial Change, 2013,80(5):944-955.

引证文献3

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部