能力二元性对企业竞争力的影响研究——组织冗余的调节效应被引量：13

The Effect of Capability Ambidexterity on Firm Competitiveness: Contingent Roles of Organizational Slack

导出

摘要探讨了企业技术能力与营销能力的二元性对企业竞争力的影响以及不同类型的组织冗余对以上关系的调节作用。通过对303套中国制造类企业样本的实证研究发现:技术能力与营销能力的不平衡性与企业竞争力负相关,且两种能力的组合性与企业竞争力正相关;已吸收冗余越多,组合性与企业竞争力的正向关系越强;未吸收冗余越多,不平衡性与企业竞争力的负向关系越弱,组合性与企业竞争力的正向关系越强。 This paper explores the direct effects of ambidexterity of technological capabilities and marketing capa- bilities on firm competitiveness, and the contingent roles of different kinds of organizational slack. The empirical results based on 303 pairs of sample of Chinese manufacturing firms indicate that： The imbalance of technological capabilities and marketing capabilities has negative effect on firm competitiveness, but the interaction of technologi- cal capabilities and marketing capabilities has positive effect on firm competitiveness. Moreover, absorbed slack positively moderates the relationship between the interaction and firm competitiveness; while unabsorbed slack nega- tively moderates the relationship between the imbalance and firm competitiveness, and positively moderates the re- lationship between the interaction and firm competitiveness. This research enriches the existing research on organi- zational ambidexterity, and has some theoretical and practical significance

作者高山行李妹江旭

机构地区西安交通大学管理学院

出处《科学学与科学技术管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期137-147,共11页 Science of Science and Management of S.& T.

基金国家自然科学基金项目(71172187)

关键词能力二元性技术能力营销能力企业竞争力已吸收冗余未吸收冗余 capability ambidexterity technological capabilities marketing capabilities firm competitiveness absorbed slack unabsorbed slack

分类号 F271.3 [经济管理—企业管理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献41

1Zhou K Z, Wu E Technological capability, strategic flexibility, and product innovation[J]. Strategic Manage- ment Journal, 2010,31(5):547-561.
2Vorhies D W, Morgan N A. Benchrnarking marketing capabilities for sustainable competitive advantage[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2005,69(1):80-94.
3Morgan N A, Vorhies D W, Mason C H. Market orien- tation, marketing capabilities, and firm performance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009,30(8):909-920.
4Murray J Y, Gao G Y, Kotabe M. Market orientation and performance of export ventres: The process through marketing capabilities and competitive advanta- ges[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2011,39(2):252-269.
5Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators[J]. Journal of Management, 2008,34(3):375-409.
6Simsek Z, Heavey C, Veiga J F, et al. A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualiza- tions, antecedents, and outcomes[J]. Journal of Manage- ment Studies, 2009,46(5):864-894.
7Gibson C B, Birkinshaw J. The antecedents, conse- quences, and mediating role of organizational ambidex- terity[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2004,47(2): 209-226.
8March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizatio- nal learning[J]. Organization Science, 1991,2(1):71-87.
9Levinthal D A, March J G. The myopia of learning[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993,14($2):95-112.
10Singh J. Performance slack and risk taking in organi- zational decision making[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1986,29(3):562-585.