期刊文献+

双孔腹腔镜阑尾炎周围脓肿手术的围术期护理干预 被引量:1

Perioperative nursing intervention in double hole laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis peripheral abscess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双孔腹腔镜阑尾炎周围脓肿手术的围术期护理干预效果。方法 30例阑尾炎周围脓肿手术患者依据CO2气压不同进行临床分组,分为对照组和研究组,各15例。两组阑尾炎周围脓肿患者均给予常规的护理措施,对照组将气腹的压力设定在13~15 mm Hg(1mm Hg=0.133 k Pa)之间,注意保证患者气腹的压力恒定。研究组气腹的压力设定在8~12 mm Hg之间,保证患者气腹压力处于恒定状态。对比两组临床效果。结果研究组临床治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,并发症发生率明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论双孔腹腔镜阑尾炎周围脓肿手术的围术期护理干预可以明显提高临床疗效,降低并发症的发生,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the perioperative nursing intervention effect in double hole laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis peripheral abscess. Methods A total of 30 patients with appendicitis peripheral abscess were divided by different CO2 pressure into control group and research group, and each group contained 15 cases. Both groups received conventional nursing measures for appendicitis peripheral abscess. The control group had pneumoperitoneum pressure as constant 13-15 mm Hg (1mm Hg=0.133 kPa), and that of the research group was 8-12 mm Hg. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups. Results The research group had much higher total effective rate than the control group, and its incidence of complications was lower than the control group. Their differences all had statistical significance (P〈0.05). Conclusion Double hole laparoscopic surgery for appendicitis peripheral abscess can remarkably improve curative effect and reduce complications in perioperative nursing intervention. This method is worth clinical promotion and application.
作者 叶春梅
出处 《中国现代药物应用》 2015年第11期195-196,共2页 Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
关键词 双孔腹腔镜 阑尾炎周围脓肿 围术期护理 Double hole laparoscope Appendicitis peripheral abscess Perioperative nursing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献27

  • 1于占武,刘顺寿,玉寒冰,童伟.外科治疗老年肺癌40例的临床分析[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2009,11(2):126-127. 被引量:19
  • 2沈曲,李峥.术后尿潴留的预防及护理进展[J].中华护理杂志,2005,40(3):223-226. 被引量:311
  • 3林岩,谭淑芳,卢玉友主编.实用手术护理学[M].广州:中山大学出版社,2000:136.
  • 4候丽.急性阑尾炎的手术护理.中外健康文摘,2010,:263-264.
  • 5吴在德.外科学[M]第6版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2004.407.
  • 6MARZOUK M, KHATER M, ELSADEK M, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective comparative study of 227 patients[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(5): 721-724.
  • 7YAU KK, SIU WT, TANG CN, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis [J]. J Am Coil Surg, 2007, 205(1): 60-65.
  • 8KRISHER SL, BROWNE A, DIBB1NS A, et al. Intra-abdominal abscess after laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendici- tis[J]. Arch Surg, 2001, 136(4): 438-441.
  • 9SAUERLAND S, LEFERING R, NEUGEBAUER EA. Random- ized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for confirmed pendicitis[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2004, 92(3): 298-304.
  • 10SCHWARZ NT, BEER-STOLZ D, SIMMONS RL, et al. Patho- genesis of paralyticileus:intestinal manipulation open satransient path way between the intestinal lumen and the leukocytic infil- trate of the jejunalmusculm'is[J]. Ann Surg, 2002, 235(1): 31-40.

共引文献134

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部