期刊文献+

不同剂量甲氧明与麻黄碱联合预注对剖宫产母婴的影响 被引量:14

Effect of varying proportion of methoxamine and ephedrine combinations in parturients and fetus during the cesarean section
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同比例甲氧明和麻黄碱联合用于预防腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉(combined spinal and epidural anesthesia, CSEA)剖宫产术中低血压的作用效果及对母婴的影响,评价联合用药不同药物比例的作用效果。方法采用随机数字表法将150例拟在CSEA下行剖宫产手术的产妇分成5组(1组~5组,每组30例),分别接受5种不同剂量浓度的甲氧明和麻黄碱混合静脉给药。假设2mg甲氧明约等效于8mg麻黄碱,各组比例分别相当于100%、75%、50%、25%、0的甲氧明和0、25%、50%、75%、100%的麻黄碱,调节输注速率以恒速泵注。测定产妇血流动力学变化和脐带血血气,记录新生儿Apgar评分,产妇恶心、呕吐及低血压情况。结果随1组-5组甲氧明的比例下降和麻黄碱比例的上升,低血压发生率有升高的趋势(1组3%、2组10%、3组7%、4组13%、5组30%)(P〈0.05)。2组、3组恶心呕吐发生率低于其他3组(1组7%、2组3%、3组0、4组10、5组23%)(P〈0.05)。1组-5组脐动脉胎儿血红蛋白值含量有下降的趋势[1组93(91~98)%、2组89(86~91)%、3组88(85~91)%、4组85(83~89)%、5组81(78~84)%](P〈0.05),二氧化碳分压有逐渐升高的趋势[1组49(46~54)mmHg、2组51(45-56)mmHg、3组53(47-57)mmHg、4组55(50—59)mmHg、5组56(51-59)mmHg(1mmHg=133kPa)](P〈0.05)。结论CSEA下剖宫产术不同剂量甲氧明和麻黄碱复合输注以维持血压时,随着甲氧明比例增大和麻黄碱比例减小,产妇血流动力学能得到更好的控制。0.375g/L甲氧明:0.5g/L麻黄碱至0.25g/L甲氧明:1g/L麻黄碱效果较好,能产生更为有利于胎儿的效应。 Objective Comparing the effects of combinations of methoxamine and ephedrine in varying proportions on preventing hypotension and maternal fetal to evaluate the curative effects of drug combinations in different proportions during combined spinal and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) for cesarean section. Methods One hundred and fifty parturients undergoing CSEA for elective cesarean delivery were randomly divided into five groups with 30 each parturients to receive intravenous administration of combinations of methoxamine and ephedrine in different proportions, respectively. Assuming that 2 mg methoxamine to be approximately equipotent to 8 mg ephedrine, five combinations drugs were infused in differents proportions which were potency equivalent of 100%, 75%, 50%, 25% or 0 of methoxamine and 0, 25%, 50%, 75% or 100% of ephedrine, respectively. Changes of maternal homodynamic and umbilical arterial blood gas analysis were measured. Infant Apgar score and incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting were also recorded. Results With the decreased proportion of methoxamine and increased ephedrine in these groups,the incidences of hypotension[group 1 (3%), group 2(10%), group 3(7%), group 4 (13%), group 5(30%)] showed a rising trend (P〈0.05). The increased of nausea/vomiting of group 2 and 3 was lower than other three groups [(group 1 7%), group 2 (3%), group 3 (0%), group 4 (10%), group 5 (23%)](P〈0.05). The study showed a downtrend of the incidence of umbilical arterial fetal hemoglobin from group 1 to group 5[group 1 93(91-98)%, group 2 89(86-91 )%,group 3 88(85-91 )%,group 4 85(83-89)%,group 5 81 ( 78 -84 ) % ] (P〈0.05) and and a uptrend of partial pressure of carbon dioxide [ group 1 49 (46 -54 ) mmHg, group 2 51 ( 45-56 ) mmHg, group 3 53(47-57) mmHg, group 4 55(50-59) mmHg, group 5 56(51-59) mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)](P〈0.05). Conclusions Combinations of methoxamine and ephedrine infused to maintain arterial blood pressure during CSEA for cesarean delivery in the proportion decreased of ephedrine and the increased proportion of methoxamine exhibits a strengthened control of maternal hemodynamic. The study shows that the range of combinations drugs from 0.375 g/L methoxamine: 0.5 g/L ephedrine to 0.25 g/L methoxamine: 1 g/L ephedrine can produce more beneficial effect on the fetus.
出处 《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》 CAS 2015年第5期412-416,共5页 International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
关键词 甲氧明 麻黄碱 剖宫产术 腰麻-硬膜外联合麻醉 低血压 Methoxamine Ephedrine Cesarean Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia Hypotension
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献65

  • 1魏璇,韩启德.α_1肾上腺素受体激动剂的亚型选择性[J].中国药理学与毒理学杂志,1995,9(3):207-211. 被引量:10
  • 2罗刚健,池信锦,关健强,黎尚荣,黑子清,陈秉学.预注甲氧明对剖宫产患者腰硬联合麻醉术中低血压的防治作用[J].广东医学,2007,28(9):1513-1514. 被引量:29
  • 3HARDMAN JG,LIMBIRD LE,古德曼·吉尔曼.治疗学的药理学基础[M].10版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:180.
  • 4GUNUSEN I, KARAMAN S, ERTUGRUL V, et al. Effects of fluid preload (crystalloid or colloid ) compared with crystalloid co-load plus ephedrine infusion on hypotension and neonatal outcome during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean delivery [ J ]. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2010, 38 (4) : 647-653.
  • 5LEE A, NGAN KEE W D, GIN T. A quantitative, syste- matic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery [ J ]. Anesth Analg,2002, 94(4): 920-926.
  • 6ENG, M, BERGES P U, UELAND K, et al. The effects of methoxamine and ephedrine in normotensive pregnant primates [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1971, 35 (4) : 354-360.
  • 7SHNIDER S M, DELORIMIER A A, ASLING J H, et al. Vasopressors in obstetrics. II. Fetal hazards of methoxamine administration during obstetric spinal anesthesia [ J ]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1970, 106 (5) : 680-686.
  • 8ERKINARO T, MAKIKALLIO K, KAVASMAA T,et al. Effects of ephedrine and methoxamine on uterine and placental circulations and fetal outcome following fetal hypoxaemia and epidural-induced hypotension in a sheep model[J]. Br J Anaesthesia, 2004, 93(6) :825-832.
  • 9American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obs- tetric Anesthesia. Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia : an updated re-port by the [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2007, 106(4): 843-863.
  • 10Lee A, Ngan Kee Wl), (;-in T. A dose response meta-analysis of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine [or the prevention of hy potension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean deliver y. Anesth Anaig, 2004, 98:483 490.

共引文献112

同被引文献111

引证文献14

二级引证文献75

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部