期刊文献+

全髋关节和人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄患者股骨颈骨折的临床效果比较

Observation on effect of patients with fracture of actual application of total hip replacement for treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:观察为高龄患者股骨颈骨折患者应用全髋关节置换术治疗的实际效果。方法:选取2012年8月-2014年2月我院收治的高龄老年股骨颈骨折患者100例,将其分成实验组50例,对照组50例,对照组行人工股骨头置换术,实验组行全髋关节置换术,比较2组手术效果。结果:实验组髋关节恢复优良率为70.0%,髋部肿痛发生率为2.0%,与对照组的44.0%、10.0%比较,差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:为高龄患者股骨颈骨折患者应用全髋关节置换术治疗,效果满意,值得进一步应用。 Objecit ve:To observe the effect of patients with fracture of the actual application of total hip replacement for the treat-ment of elderly patients with femoral neck.Me thod s:choose the elderly femoral neck in 2012 08 to 2014 02 months admitted to our hospital with fractures in 100 patients, divided into the experimental group 50 cases, control group 50 cases, control group under-went artificial femoral head replacement, the experimental group underwent total hip replacement, operation effect was compared be-tween the two groups.Results:the excellent and good rate of experimental group was 70%recovery of hip,hip paln occurrence rate was 2%, compared with a control group of44 %, 10%, there were significant differences(P〈0 .05).Conc lusion: the applica-tion of fracture in patients with total hip replacement in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral neck , for satisfactory results, might be worthy of further application.
出处 《中国伤残医学》 2015年第10期3-5,共3页 Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine
关键词 全髋关节 人工股骨头置换术 高龄患者 股骨颈骨折 效果比较 Total hip arthroplasty Artificial femoral head replacement Elderly patients Femoral neck fracture Effect comparison
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献38

  • 1李波,阿力,张旭,关瑞盛,周桂花.双极人工股骨头置换术治疗老年股骨颈骨折的治疗结果探讨[J].兵团医学,2007(2):52-53. 被引量:1
  • 2黄少辉,何兴国,吴伟华.人工股骨头置换与人工全髋置换术治疗老年人股骨颈骨折的疗效比较[J].吉林医学,2006,27(1):34-35. 被引量:29
  • 3史景超,黄常福,马绪巍.人工股骨头置换术治疗高龄老年股骨颈骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2006,9(5):471-471. 被引量:36
  • 4Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1969,51 (4) :737-755.
  • 5Kirmit L, Karatosun V, Uriver B, et al. The reliability of hip scoring systems for total hip arthroplasty candidates: assessment by physical therapists [J]. Clin Rehabil,2005,19(6): 659-661.
  • 6Trombetti A,Herrmann F, Hoffmeyer P,et al. Survival and potential years of life lost after hip fracture in men and age-matched women[J].Osteoporos Int,2002,13(9) :731-737.
  • 7Rodriguez-Merehan EC. Displaced intraeapsular hip fractures: hemiarthroplasty or total arthroplasty [J]. Clin Orthop,2002,21 ( 1 ) : 72.
  • 8Ravikumar KJ, Marsh G. Internal fixation versus hemiarthroplasty versus total hip arthroplasty for displaced subcapital fractures of femur-13 year results of a prospective randomised study [ J]. Injury, 2000,31 (10) :793-797.
  • 9Liu JM, Ning G, Chen JL. Osteoporotic fractures in Asia:risk factorsand strategies for prevention [J]. J Bone Miner Metab,2007,25(1.):1.
  • 10陆裕朴,胥少汀,葛宝丰,等.实用骨科学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2005:460.

共引文献105

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部