期刊文献+

沙牌坝址的最大可信地震研究 被引量:2

Study on the maximum credible earthquake of Shapai dam site
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何给出能够反映近场大震特点的坝址的最大可信地震是在我国西部修建高坝时需要考虑的重要问题。以我国西部重大水电工程沙牌拱坝为例,结合有限断层模型和地震学随机方法,将震源视为三维的空间面源,进行坝址在近场大震条件下的最大可信地震研究。选择茂县地办台站(051MXT)记录,对汶川地震的震源模型和参数进行校核,作为本文研究的模型和参数依据。确定对沙牌坝址区域影响最大的发震构造为龙门山断裂带。(1)假定龙门山中央断裂未来再次发生Ms8.0级地震,设置不同高危险的震源模型,比较结果显示,对沙牌坝址而言汶川地震不是最大潜在地震,最大凹凸体的能量中心距坝址最近的震源形式最危险,坝址的峰值加速度一般不超过380 cm/s2。(2)若发震能力稍弱的龙门山后山断裂未来发生Mw7.5级地震,遵循两种思路考虑震源的不确定性,即设置最危险震源和随机设定大量震源模型,且均计入关键参数的不确定性。两种思路合成的沙牌坝址的峰值加速度非常接近,根据工程重要性取较大值,得到沙牌坝址的峰值加速度为735 cm/s2。 It is an important issue to consider in the construction of high dam in western China how to provide the maximum credible earthquake of dam site which is able to reflect the characteristics of large earthquakes in near field. Taking the Shapai Arch Dam, a major hydropower projects in western China, as an example, both finite fault model and stochastic method of seismology are combined, and the seismic source is treated as a three-dimensional spatial fault rupture to study the maximum credible earthquake of dam site under the condition of large earthquakes in the near-source region. The recorded accelerograms at 051MXT rock station from the Wenchuan earthquake is chosen to validate the finite earthquake source models and parameters, serving as the basis of models and parameters for the study in this paper. The Long- menshan fault zone is determined as the seismogenic structure which has the greatest influence on the area of Shapai dam site. First, suppose there will be another MsS.0 earthquake recurring in the central fault of the Longmenshan fault zone, and set the models of earthquake sources of different high risks for compari- son, whose results show that Wenchuan Earthquake is not the maximum potential earthquake as for the Shapai dam site, the form of earthquake source in which the distance between the energy center of the greatest asperity and the dam site is the shortest is the most dangerous, and the peak acceleration of the simulated acceleration time histories at the dam site is generally below 380 cm/s2. Secondly, if there will be a MwT.5 earthquake occurring in the back range faults of the Longmenshan fault zone where the seismo- genic potential is a little weaker, the uncertainty of earthquake source is considered by the following two ways, that is to set up the most dangerous earthquake source and randomly set a large number of earth- quake source models, both reckoning in uncertainty of the key parameters. The peak accelerations of the Shapai dam site obtained from those two ways are very close. However, according to the engineering impor- tance, the peak acceleration of the Shapai dam site is determined 735 cm/s2 by choosing the bigger ones.
出处 《水利学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期471-479,共9页 Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
基金 中国工程院重点项目(西部强震区高坝场址地震动输入研究) 水利部行业专项1519 中国水科院十二五专项(抗集1237)
关键词 沙牌坝址 最大可信地震 近场大震 有限断层模型 地震学随机方法 龙门山断裂 Shapai dam site the maximum credible earthquake(MCE) large earthquakes in near field finite fault model stochastic method of seismology Longmenshan fault zone
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陈厚群,徐泽平,李敏.汶川大地震和大坝抗震安全[J].水利学报,2008,39(10):1158-1167. 被引量:82
  • 2张翠然,陈厚群,李敏.采用随机有限断层法生成最大可信地震[J].水利学报,2011,42(6):721-728. 被引量:12
  • 3Boore D M . Simulation of ground motion using the stochastic method[J] . Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2003, 160: 635-676.
  • 4Motazedian D, Atkinson G M . Stochastic finite-fault modeling based on a dynamic corner frequency[J] . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2005, 95 ( 3 ) : 995-1010,.
  • 5Moghaddam H, Fanaie N, Motazedian D . Estimation of stress drop for some large shallow earthquakes using sto-chastic point source and finite fault modeling[ J ] . Transaction A : Civil Engineering, 2013, 17 (3) : 217-235 .
  • 6Atkinson G M, Boore D M . Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for Eastern North America[J] . Bulle- tin of the Seismological Society of America, 2006, 96(6) : 2181-2205 .
  • 7张勇,许力生,陈运泰.2008年汶川大地震震源机制的时空变化[J].地球物理学报,2009,52(2):379-389. 被引量:73
  • 8四川赛思特科技有限责任公司.汶川沙牌水电站工程场地地震安全性评价复核报告[R].成都:四川I赛思特科技有限责任公司,2008.
  • 9李勇,黄润秋,周荣军,Alexander L.DENSMORE,Michael A.ELLIS,闫亮,董顺利,Nicholas RICHARDSON,张毅,何玉林,陈浩,乔宝成,马博琳.龙门山地震带的地质背景与汶川地震的地表破裂[J].工程地质学报,2009,17(1):3-18. 被引量:110
  • 10Wells D L, Coppersmith K J . New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rup- ture area, and surface displacement [J] . Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1994, 84 (4) : 974-1002.

二级参考文献64

共引文献269

同被引文献9

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部