期刊文献+

Comparing the adsorption behaviors of Cd, Cu and Pb from water onto Fe-Mn binary oxide, MnO2 and FeOOH 被引量:5

Comparing the adsorption behaviors of Cd, Cu and Pb from water onto Fe-Mn binary oxide, MnO2 and FeOOH
原文传递
导出
摘要 The adsorption potential of FMBO, FeOOH, MnO2 for the removal of Cd^2+, Cu^2+ and Pb^2+ in aqueous systems was investigated in this study. Comparing to FMBO and FeOOH, MnO2 offered a much higher removal capacity towards the three metal ions. The maximal adsorption capacity of MnO2 for Cd^2+, Cu^2+ and Pb^2+ were 1.23, 2.25 and 2.60 mmol· g^-1, respectively. And that for FMBO were 0.37, 1.13, and 1.18mmol·g^-1 and for FeOOH were 0.11, 0.86 and 0.48 mmol·g^-1, respectively. The adsorption behaviors of the three metal ions on the three adsorbents were all significantly affected by pH values and heavy metal removal efficiency increased with pH increased. The Langmuir and Freundlieh adsorption models were used to describe the adsorption equilibrium of the three metal ions onto the three adsorbents. Results showed that the adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to Langmuir isotherm and this indicated that adsorption of metal ions occurred on the three metal oxides adsorbents limited to the formation of a monolayer. More negative charged of MnOa surface than that of FMBO and FeOOH could be ascribed by lower pHiep of MnO2 than that of FMBO and FeOOH and this could contribute to more binding sites on MnO2 surface than that of FMBO and FeOOH. The higher metal ions uptake by MnO2 than FMBO and FeOOH could be well explained by the surface charge mechanism. The adsorption potential of FMBO, FeOOH, MnO2 for the removal of Cd^2+, Cu^2+ and Pb^2+ in aqueous systems was investigated in this study. Comparing to FMBO and FeOOH, MnO2 offered a much higher removal capacity towards the three metal ions. The maximal adsorption capacity of MnO2 for Cd^2+, Cu^2+ and Pb^2+ were 1.23, 2.25 and 2.60 mmol· g^-1, respectively. And that for FMBO were 0.37, 1.13, and 1.18mmol·g^-1 and for FeOOH were 0.11, 0.86 and 0.48 mmol·g^-1, respectively. The adsorption behaviors of the three metal ions on the three adsorbents were all significantly affected by pH values and heavy metal removal efficiency increased with pH increased. The Langmuir and Freundlieh adsorption models were used to describe the adsorption equilibrium of the three metal ions onto the three adsorbents. Results showed that the adsorption equilibrium data fitted well to Langmuir isotherm and this indicated that adsorption of metal ions occurred on the three metal oxides adsorbents limited to the formation of a monolayer. More negative charged of MnOa surface than that of FMBO and FeOOH could be ascribed by lower pHiep of MnO2 than that of FMBO and FeOOH and this could contribute to more binding sites on MnO2 surface than that of FMBO and FeOOH. The higher metal ions uptake by MnO2 than FMBO and FeOOH could be well explained by the surface charge mechanism.
出处 《Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2015年第3期385-393,共9页 环境科学与工程前沿(英文)
关键词 heavy metals Fe-Mn binary oxide manga- nese dioxide ferric hydroxide ADSORPTION heavy metals, Fe-Mn binary oxide, manga- nese dioxide, ferric hydroxide, adsorption
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献23

  • 1Berg M, Tran H C, Nguyen T C, Pham H V, Schertenleib R, Giger W, 2001. Arsenic contamination of groundwater and drinking waiter in Vietnam: A human health threat. Environmental Science & Technology, 35(13): 2621-2626.
  • 2Bundschuh J, Farias B, Martin R, Storniolo A, Bhattacharya P, Cortes Jet al., 2004. Groundwater arsenic in the ChacoPampean Plain, Argentina: Case study from Robles County, Santiago del Estero Province. Applied Geochemistry, 19: 231-243.
  • 3Ferguson J E Garvis J, 1972. Review of arsenic cycle in natural waters. Water Research, 6: 1259-1274.
  • 4Guo H M, Stuben D, Berner Z, 2007. Adsorption of arsenic(m) and arsenic(V) from groundwater using natural siderite as the adsorbent. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 315: 47-53.
  • 5Guo H M, Yang S Z, Tang X H, Li Y, Shen Z L, 2008. Groundwater geochemistry and its implications for arsenic mobilization in shallow aquifers of the Hetao Basin, Inner.
  • 6Halim M A, Majumder R K, Nessa S A, Hiroshiro Y, Uddin M J, Shimada Jet al., 2009. Hydrogeochemistry and arsenic contamination of groundwater in the Ganges Delta Plain, Bangladesh. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 164: 1335- 1345.
  • 7Hiemstra T, van Riemsdijk W H, 2007. Adsorption and surface oxidation of Fe(II) on metal (hydr)oxides. Geochimica et Cosmochimica A cta, 71: 5913-5933.
  • 8Katsoyiannis I A, Zouboulis A I, 2002. Removal of arsenic from contaminated water sources by sorption onto ironoxide-coated polymeric materials. Water Research, 36: 5141-5155.
  • 9Leupin O X, Hug S J, Badruzzaman A B M, 2005. Arsenic re- moval from Bangladesh tube well water with filter columns containing zerovalent iron filings and sand. Environmental Science & Technology, 39: 8032-8037.
  • 10Meng X G, Korfiatis G P, Christodoulatos C, Bang S, 2001. Treatment of arsenic in Bangladesh well water using a household co-precipitation and filtration system. Water Research, 35(12): 2805-2810.

共引文献10

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部