期刊文献+

基于系统动力学的跑道侵入风险演化博弈研究 被引量:5

A Research on Evolutionary Game of Runway Incursion Risks Based on System Dynamics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为探究跑道侵入风险控制中机场、航空公司与行业政府的博弈策略,构建了基于支付函数矩阵的三方演化博弈模型,并运用系统动力学对演化博弈过程进行仿真分析。设置了2种仿真环境:演化博弈模型中概率突变的情景以及动态监管策略下的博弈过程,通过了模型检验及灵敏度分析。仿真结果表明:该博弈模型存在有效解,但不存在演化稳定均衡解;改进的行业政府动态监管策略条件下存在演化稳定均衡解。得出结论:行业政府实行动态监管策略,令经济制裁额度为跑道侵入风险严重度的函数,促使机场和航空公司加大跑道侵入风险的控制力度。 In order to investigate game strategies between airports, airlines and industrial government for controlling runway incursion risks, a tripartite evolutionary game model is built based on payoff function matrix and the evolutionary game process simulated based on system dynamics. Two kinds of simulation en- vironments are set up, including probability mutation and dynamic regulation. The model has passed tests and sensitivity analysis. Simulation results show that the game model has effective solutions, but there is no evolutionary equilibrium. There is evolutionary equilibrium under the condition of dynamic regulation strategy. The conclusion is that economic sanction is imposed as the function of runway incursion risks se- verity. Industrial government implements dynamic regulation strategy which pushes airports and airlines to intensify the control of runway incursion risks.
作者 赵贤利 罗帆
出处 《工业工程》 2015年第2期73-79,共7页 Industrial Engineering Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71271163)
关键词 跑道侵入 演化博弈 系统动力学 runway incursion evolutionary game system dynamics
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Singh G K, Meier C. Preventing runway incursions and con- flicts [ J ]. Aerospace Science and Technology, 2004,8 (7) : 653-670.
  • 2Schonefeld J, Moller D P F. Runway incursion prevention systems: A review of runway incursion avoidance and aler- ting system approaches [ J ]. Progress in Aerospace Sci- ences ,2012,51 ( 5 ) :31-49.
  • 3Stroeve S H, Blom H A P, Bakker G J. Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modeling[ J]. Re- liability Engineering and System Safety,2013,109( 1 ) :133- 149.
  • 4许桂梅,黄圣国.基于风险防御的机场跑道事故风险控制研究[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2010,6(3):106-109. 被引量:6
  • 5Wangermann J P, Stengel R F. Principled negotiation be-tween intelligent agents: a model fir air traffic management [J]. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering, 1998,12 (3): 177-187.
  • 6Francis G, Fidato A, Humphreys I. Airport - airline inter- action: the impact of low-cost carriers on two European air- ports[ J]. Jounaal of Air Transport Management, 2003,9 (4) :267-273.
  • 7Auerbach S, Koch B. Cooperative approaches to managing air traffic efficiently-the airline perspective [ J ]. Journal of Air Transport Management, 2007,13 ( 1 ) : 37-44.
  • 8Everdij M H C, Blom H A P, Seholte J J, et al. Developing a framework for safety validation of multi-stakeholder chan- ges in air transport operations [ J ]. Safety Science, 2009,47 ( 3 ) : 405-420.
  • 9Zhang An-ming, Fu Xiao-wen, Yang Hang-jun (Gavin). Revenue sharing with multiple airlines and airports [ J ]. Transportation Research: Part B, 2010,44 ( 8-9 ) : 944- 959.
  • 10陈卫.机场、航空公司、空管的关系与政府管理[J].中国民用航空,2002(11):24-28. 被引量:4

二级参考文献16

共引文献25

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部