期刊文献+

不同稀释液对甲磺酸罗哌卡因臂丛麻醉的影响 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:讨论不同稀释液对甲磺酸罗哌卡因臂丛麻醉的影响。方法90例ASA1~3级的择期或急诊行上肢桡侧为主要手术区域的患者,随机分为2组,N组(0.894%甲磺酸罗哌卡因20ml+生理盐水10ml)和G组(0.894%甲磺酸罗哌卡因20ml+5%葡萄糖10ml),行肌间沟路臂丛麻醉,观察患者术中生命体征的变化,记录各组病例感觉运动阻滞起效、恢复时间,围术期局麻药不良反应及麻醉相关并发症。结果两组患者臂丛阻滞起效后BP、HR有所下降,但均未达到需要处理程度。臂丛阻滞效果佳,无1例患者需要改为全麻,N组有3例,G组4例患者在术中因不能耐受上臂止血带需要追加静脉镇痛药物;感觉与运动阻滞起效时间时间,G组快于N组,差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05),而两组的感觉运动恢复时间并无明显区别。两组患者围术期无明显局麻药物不良反应及麻醉相关并发症。结论使用5%葡萄糖稀释甲磺酸罗哌卡因行臂丛麻醉,感觉和运动阻滞的起效时间有所缩短,而未影响术后的镇痛时长,有利于繁忙的临床工作。
出处 《浙江创伤外科》 2015年第2期398-400,共3页 Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1刘庆仁,曹丽燕,陈辉.罗哌卡因与布比卡因在剖宫产手术中麻醉效果比较[J].齐齐哈尔医学院学报,2014,35(15):2244-2246. 被引量:15
  • 2张研,胡允梅,田荣,郭莉芳,杨喜璇,谢丹.葡萄糖对罗哌卡因蛛网膜下腔阻滞的影响[J].新乡医学院学报,2008,25(6):576-578. 被引量:6
  • 3Striehartz GR,Pastijn E,Sugimoto K. Neural physiology and local anesthetic ac- tion. In:Cousins MJ,Carr DB,Horlocker TY, Bridenbaugh PO,eds. Cousins & Bridenbaugh's Neural Blockade. 4th ed. PhiladelphiaLippincott,Williams & Wilkins, 2009: 26-47.
  • 4Kanai A, Hoka S. A comparison of epidu- ral blockade produced by plain 1% lido- caine and 1% lidocaine prepared by dilu- tion of 2% lidocaine with the same volume of saline[J]. Anesth Aualg,2006,102(6) : 1851-1855.
  • 5Kallio H,Snall EVT,Kero M P,et al. A comparison of intrathecal plain solutions containing ropivacaine 20 or 15mg versus bupivacaine 10mg [J] . Anesth Analg, 2004,99(3) : 713-717 .
  • 6Malinovsky JM,Charles F,Kick O,et al . Intrathecal anesthesia:ropivaeaine versus bupivaeain [J].Anesth Analg, 2000,91 (6) : 1457-1460.
  • 7赵状,金立民,宋雪松,杨希革,麻海春.不同浓度葡萄糖复合罗哌卡因用于老年患者腰麻的效果[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,31(20):3911-3914. 被引量:8
  • 8Sakura S,Chan VWS,Ciriales R,et al. The addition of 7.5% glucose does not al- ter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine ad- ministered intrathecally in the rat [J]. Anesthesiology, 1995,82(1) : 236-240.
  • 9Hashimoto K,Sakura S,Bollen AW,et al. Comparative toxicity of glucose and lido- caine administered intrathecally in rats [J].Reg Anesth Pain Med, 1998,23(5):444 -450.
  • 10Whiteside JB,Burke D,Wildsmith JAW. Comparison of ropivacaine 0.5% (in glu- cose 5%) with bupivacaine 0.5% (in glu- cose 8%) for spinal anesthesia for elective surgery[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2003,90(3) : 304- 308.

二级参考文献26

  • 1肖少华,罗振中,夏敏,余奇劲,夏中元.罗哌卡因与布比卡因用于蛛网膜下腔阻滞的疗效比较[J].医药导报,2005,24(1):43-44. 被引量:9
  • 2张军,张庆.左旋布比卡因与罗哌卡因在剖宫产术中的应用比较[J].实用全科医学,2007,5(5):401-402. 被引量:12
  • 3马烈 刘俊杰 见:刘俊杰 赵俊 主编.椎管内麻醉的意外及并发症[A].见:刘俊杰,赵俊,主编.现代麻醉学:第2版[C].北京:人民卫生出版社,1997.649~650.
  • 4Kallio H, Snail EVT, Kero MP,et al. A comparison of intrathecal plain solutions containing ropivacaine 20 or 15 mg versus bupivacaine 10 mg[J]. Anesth Analg,2004,99(3 ) :713-717.
  • 5Malinovsky JM, Charles F, Kick O, et al. Intrathecal anesthesia: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2000,91 ( 6 ) : 1457-1460.
  • 6Kooger Infante NE, Van Gessel E, Forster A, et al. Extent of hyperbaric spinal anesthesia influences the duration of spinal block [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 2000,92 ( 6 ) : 1319-1323.
  • 7Svensson LG,Klepp P,Hinder RA.Spinal cord anesthesia of the baboon comparison with man and implications of spinal cord blood flow during thoracic aortic cross-clamping[J].A Afr J Surg,1986 ;24:32-4.
  • 8Ganem EM,Vianna PT,Marques M,et al.Neurotoxicity of subarachnoid hyperbaric bupivacaine in dogs[J].Reg Anesth,1997 ;22(2):198-9.
  • 9Sakura S,Chan VW,Ciriales R,et al.The addition of 7. 5% glucose does not alter the neurotoxicity of 5% lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat[J].Anesthesiology,1995 ; 82 (1):236-40.
  • 10Hashimoto K,Sakura S,Bollen AW,et al.Comparative toxicity of glucose and lidocaine administered intrathecally in the rat[J].Reg Anesth Pain Med,1998 ;23 (5):444-50.

共引文献26

同被引文献22

  • 1农光,李泽均,黄伟芝,陶宗欣,邹艺.B超定位肌间沟臂丛神经阻滞的临床应用[J].华夏医学,2007,20(4):752-754. 被引量:13
  • 2Serradell A, Herrero R, Villanueva J A, et al. Compari- son of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation [ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2003,91 (4) :519-524.
  • 3Barbosa F T, Pinto A L, da Cunha R M. comparative study of the postoperative analgesic efficacy of 20 ml of 0. 5, 0. 75, and 1% ropivacaine in posterior brachial plexus block [ J ]. Rev Bras Anestesiol, 2009,59 ( 2 ) : 259 -260.
  • 4Pavicic Saric J, Vidjak V, Tomulic K, et al. Effects of age on minimum effective volume of local anesthetic for ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block [ J ]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2013,57 ( 6 ) : 761-766.
  • 5Song J G, Jeon D G, Kang B J, et al. Minimum effective volume of mepivacaine for ultrasound-guided supraclavic- ular block[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2013,65 ( 1 ) :37-41.
  • 6Yang C W, KangP S, Kwon H U, et al. Effects of in- creasing the dose of ropivacaine on vertical infraclavicular block using neurostimulation [ J ]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2012,63 ( 1 ) :36-.42.
  • 7Hanumanthaiah D, Vaidiyanathan S, Garstka M, et al. Ultrasound guided supraclavicular block [ J ]. Med Ultra- son, 2013,15 (3) :224-229.
  • 8Gautier P, Vandepitte C, Ramquet C, et al. The mini- mum effective anesthetic volume of 0.75% ropivacaine in ultrasound-guided interscalene brachial plexus block [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2011,113(4) :951-955.
  • 9McNaught A, Shastri U, Carmichael N, et al. Ultrasound reduces the minimum effective local anaesthetic volume compared with peripheral nerve stimulation for inter- scalene block [ J]. Br J Anaesth, 2011,106 ( 1 ) : 124- 130.
  • 10Riazi S, Carmiehael N, Awad I, et al. Effect of local an- aesthetic volume (20 vs 5 ml) on the efficacy and respir- atory consequences of ultrasound-guided intersealene bra- chial plexus block [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 2008,101 ( 4 ) : 549- 556.

引证文献2

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部