期刊文献+

正负网络效应共存的社交平台定价问题 被引量:8

Pricing Problem of Social Network Platforms with Co-Existence of Positive and Negative Network Effects
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对资源的正网络效应和广告的负网络效应共存的社交平台定价问题,构建了双寡头博弈模型,给出了博弈的纳什均衡,分析了均衡情况下资源和广告数量以及平台收益如何变化.研究发现,平台提供的资源与广告数量之比(资源广告比)对平台具有至关重要的影响.平台对网络用户免费,实际成本通过广告费转嫁给了广告商.当资源广告比增加时,资源和广告的数量变化并不单调,而是存在一个转折点.为了使平台收益最大化,最佳的资源广告比总是在可行范围的两端.研究结果有助于揭示平台如何平衡资源和广告. This paper studied the pricing problem of social network platforms with the co-existence of positive network effects of resources and negative network effects of advertisements. A duopoly competition model was built and the Nash equilibrium of the game was obtained. In equilibrium, the variation of quantities of resources, advertisements, and platform profits were then analyzed. It is found out that the ratio of resources to advertisement has an important impact on platforms. The platforms offer network users services free of charge, whereas the actual costs are shifted onto advertisers through advertising fees. As the ratio of resources to advertisement increases, the variation of quantities of resources and advertisement are not monotonous, instead there exists a turning point. In order to maximize platform profits, the optimal ratio of resources to advertisement lies at the boundary of feasible region. The results of this paper help to reveal how platforms balance resources and advertisements.
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期519-523,共5页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71171182) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资助(WK2040150003)
关键词 社交网络平台 双边市场 正网络效应 负网络效应 social network platform two-sided market positive network effect negative network effect
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Evans D S. Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries [J].Review of Network Econom- ics, 2003, 2(3): 191-209.
  • 2Katz M L, Shapiro C. Network externalities, compe- tition, and compatibility [J].The American Economic Review, 1985, 75(3): 424-440.
  • 3Farrell J, Saloner G. Standardization, compatibility, and innovation[J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1985,16(1) : 70-83.
  • 4曹俊浩,陈宏民,石彼得.基于双边市场理论的B2B垄断平台自网络外部性分类及其强度研究[J].上海交通大学学报,2010,44(12):1661-1664. 被引量:25
  • 5Rochet J C, Tirole J. Platform competition in two-si- ded markets [J]. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2003, 1(4): 990-1029.
  • 6Anderson S P, Coate S. Market provision of broad- casting: A welfare analysis [J]. The Review of Eco- nomic Studies, 2005, 72(4): 947-972.
  • 7Choi J P. Broadcast competition and advertising withfree entry: Subscription vs. free-to-air [J]. Informa- tion Economics and Policy, 2006, 18(2) : 181-196.
  • 8Peitz M, Valletti T M. Content and advertising in the media: Pay-TV versus free-to-Air [J]. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 2008, 26(4) : 949- 965.
  • 9程贵孙,陈宏民.基于双边市场的传媒产业政府规制[J].上海交通大学学报,2008,42(9):1479-1482. 被引量:15
  • 10朱振中,吕廷杰.具有负的双边网络外部性的媒体市场竞争研究[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(6):13-23. 被引量:35

二级参考文献66

共引文献151

同被引文献123

引证文献8

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部