期刊文献+

离子交换法制备低植酸含量大豆蛋白的研究 被引量:3

Preparation of Low-phytate Soy Protein by Ion Exchange
下载PDF
导出
摘要 大豆食品中的植酸会阻碍多种矿物离子及蛋白的吸收,为了提高大豆蛋白的营养吸收性,加工中应去除植酸。本文研究了离子交换法脱除大豆分离蛋白中植酸的方法和效果,并进一步考察了处理后大豆蛋白的理化性质。结果表明:透析、超滤与离子交换法进行比较,阴离子交换后植酸含量下降77%,较优于其他方法。后采用离子交换法去除大豆蛋白中的植酸,对不同树脂、不同蛋白状态及酸碱度对植酸的去除效果进行比较,以确定植酸去除的最优方案。与其他树脂相比,D201树脂对植酸的吸附率达到12 mg·m L-1,在p H7.0的条件下可将植酸含量降低到1 mg·g-1,下降约90%。制备的低植酸含量的大豆蛋白等电点向右偏移,溶解性略有下降,分散速度有所提高。 Phytic acid in soybean food can affect the absorption of many mineral and protein. In order to improve the nutrient absorption of soy protein, phytic acid should be removed in processing. This paper studies the method and effect of removing phytic acidin soybean isolated protein by ion exchange method, and also the physical and chemical properties of soybean pro- tein after ion exchange processing. The methods of dialysis, uhrafihration and ion-exchange are compared, the method of anion exchange decrease the content of phytic acid by 77% , which is superior to other methods. An optimal phytate removing method was chosen by comparing the phytate removing effect in different kinds of resins, protein stages and pH values. The results showed that the resin adsorption rate of D201was as high as 12 mg ~ mL-' resin. Under the condition of pHT, it could reduce the phytate level by 90% to a concentration of 1 mg · g-i protein. Isoelectric point (pI) of the low-phytate soybean protein showed a right shift, with a decreasing solubility and an increasing dispersion speed.
出处 《大豆科学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期293-297,共5页 Soybean Science
基金 国家"十二五"科技支撑计划(2012BAD34B03)
关键词 植酸 大豆蛋白 阴离子交换树脂 Phytate Soybean protein Ion exchange of anion
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Brooks J R, Morr C V. Phytate removal from soy protein isolates using ion exchange processing treatments[J].Journal of Food Science, 1982,47(4):1280-1282.
  • 2Ali F, Ippersiel D, Lamarche F, et al.Characterization of low-phytate soy protein isolates produced by membrane technologies[J].Innovative Food Science & Emerging Technologies, 2010,11(1):162-168.
  • 3Carnovale E, Lugaro E, Lombardi Boccia G.Phytic acid in faba bean and pea: effect on protein availability[J].Cereal Chemistry, 1988,65(2):114-117.
  • 4Kuiper G G, Lemmen G J, Carlsson B. Interaction of estrogenic chemicals and phytoestrogens withestrogen receptor beta[J].Endocrinology, 1998, 10:139(10):4252-4263.
  • 5Tsumura K, Saito T, Kugimiya W. Influence of phytase treatment on the gelation property of soymilk[J].Food Science and Technology Research, 2004,10(4):442-446.
  • 6范玲慧.婴儿豆基粉原料中植酸含量及致敏性递减化技术的研究[D].北京: 中国农业大学, 2012.
  • 7南昌希,周丽萍.大麦内源酶去除大豆植酸的研究[J].食品研究与开发,2005,26(5):33-35. 被引量:3
  • 8孙艳梅,张永忠,王伊强,许晶.大豆β-葡萄糖苷酶水解大豆异黄酮糖苷的研究[J].中国粮油学报,2006,21(2):86-89. 被引量:36
  • 9Badger T M, Gilchrist J M, Pivik R T, et al.The health implications of soy infant formula[J].The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009,89(5):1668-1672.
  • 10Mondor M, Ippersiel D, Lamarche F, et al.Effect of electro-acidification treatment and ionic environment on soy protein extract particle size distribution and ultrafiltration permeate flux[J].Journal of Membrane Science, 2004,231(1):169-179.

二级参考文献56

共引文献46

同被引文献23

引证文献3

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部