期刊文献+

深圳市食物中毒来源金黄色葡萄球菌的分子流行病学分析 被引量:5

Molecular epidemiological survey of Staphylococcus aureus from food poisoning samples in Shenzhen city
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的建立金黄色葡萄球菌(金葡菌)的分子分型技术,研究深圳市食物中毒来源金葡菌的分子流行病学特征。方法对食物中毒事件中食物链的不同环节均采集标本,进行金葡菌分离培养。对所分离菌株同时应用SPA分型及PFGE技术作分子流行病学分析。结果 136起疑似食物中毒事件中有12起能够从食物链不同环节分离到金葡菌,共59株。PFGE将59株金葡菌分为15个型别,在10起食物中毒事件的不同环节中分析到PFGE型别一致的菌株,分辨系数为0.87。SPA分型将59株金葡菌分为10个型别,在12起食物中毒事件中不同环节样品中分析到SPA型别一致的菌株,分辨系数为0.85。结论 PFGE的分辨力高于SPA分型;通过结合流行病学资料分析,12起食物中毒事件中有6起能够通过分子分型方法准确溯源。 Objective To establish different molecular method for genotyping Staphylococcus aureus. Methods Thespecimens were extracted from different segments of the food chain in the suspected food- posoning cases for isolation anculture of the Staphylococcus aureus. The isolated bacteria strains with the SPA and PFGE genotyping technique wereepidemiologically analyzed. Results Fifty-nine Staphylococcus aureus strains were isolated from specimens from 12 casesof the 159 food-poisoning events. The 59 strains were divided into 15 genotypes by PFGE,and it could get the same strains asPFGE type from different segments in the 10 food poisoning cases, resolution ratio is 0.87. 59 strains were divided into 10 genotypes by SPA,and it can get the same strains as SPA type from different segments in the 12 food poisoning cases, resolutionratio is 0.85. Conclusion Base on the results of molecular typing and epidemic data, we consider there are 6 cases of food-poisoning diseases are effective in tracing infection sources of Staphylococcus aureu,PFGE's resolution is higher than SPA type.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2015年第2期151-154,196,共5页 China Tropical Medicine
基金 广东省医学科研基金立项项目(No.B2012325) 深圳市科技局立项项目(No.201102103)
关键词 金黄色葡萄球菌 脉冲场凝胶电泳 分子分型 分子流行病学 Staphylococcus aureus Pulsed field gel electrophoresis Molecular typing molecular epidemiology
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1高涛.食品中金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素及检测方法的研究进展[J].福建分析测试,2003,12(2):1775-1778. 被引量:73
  • 2Koziol-Montewka M, Szczepanik A, Baranowicz I, et al. The investiga- tion of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci nasal carriage among patients undergoing haemodialysis [J]. Microbiol Res, 2006, 161(4):281-287.
  • 3Turlej A, Hryniewicz W, Empel J. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (Scemec) classification and typing methods: an overview [J]. Pol J Microbiol, 2011, 60(2): 95-103.
  • 4Kuo SC, Chiang MC, Lee WS, et al. Comparison of microbiological and clinical characteristics based on SCCmec typing in patients with com- munity-onset meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bac-teraemia [J]. Int J Antimicrob Agents, 2013,39(1):22-26.
  • 5Bosch T, de Neeling A J, Sehouls LM, et al. PFGE diversity within the methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus elonal lineage ST398 [J]. BMC Microbiol,2010, 10(40): 122-124.
  • 6Melles DC, van Leeuwen WB, Snijders SV, et al. Comparison of multilo- cus sequence typing (MLST), pulsed-field gel elcctrophoresis (PFGE), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) for genetic typing of Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2007, 69(2): 371- 373.
  • 7Sabat AJ, Chlebowicz MA, Grundmann H, et al. Microfluidic-chip- based multiple-locus variable-number tandem-repeat fingerprinting with new primer sets for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2013, 50(7):2255-2262.
  • 8Sobral D, Schwarz S, Bergonier D, et al. High throughput multiple locus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA) of Staphylococcus aureus from human, animal and food sources [J]. PLoS One, 2012: 7(5): e33967.
  • 9Coombs GW, Goering RV, Chua KY, et al. The Molecular Epidemiolo- gy of the Highly Virulent ST93 Australian Community Staphylococcus aureus Strain [J]. PLoS One, 2012; 7(8):e43037.
  • 10Babouee B, Frei R, Schuhheiss E, et al. Comparison of the DiversiLab repetitive element PCR system with spa typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for clonal characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2011, 49(4): 1549- 1555.

二级参考文献22

  • 1林新坚,陈济琛,杨佩玉,郑时利.蘑菇罐头中金黄色葡萄球菌肠毒素研究概况[J].福建农业科技,1994,25(5):23-23. 被引量:2
  • 2[1]Lowy FD. Staphylococcus aureus infections. N Engl J Med, 1998, 339 (8): 520-530.
  • 3[2]Vojtov N, Ross HF, Novick RP. Global repression of exotoxin synthesis by staphylococoal superantigens.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2002, 99 (15): 10102-10107.
  • 4[5]Ren K, Bannan JD, Pancholi V, et al. Characterization and biological properties of a new staphylococcal exotoxin. J Exp Med, 1994, 180 (5): 1675-1683.
  • 5[6]Su YC, Wong AC. Identification and purification of a new staphylococcal enterotoxin, H. Appl Environ Microbiol, 1995, 61 (4): 1438-1443.
  • 6[7]Munson SH, Tremaine MT, Betley MJ, et al.Identification and Characterization of Staphylococcal Enterotoxin Types G and I from Staphylococcus aureus, Infect Immun, 1998, 66 (7): 3337-3348.
  • 7[8]Marrack P, Kapple J. The staphylococcal enterotoxins and their relatives. Science, 1990, 248 (4956): 705-711.
  • 8[9]Fujikawa H, Takayama H, Uchiyama T, Igarashi H.Bindings of toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 and staphylococcal enterotoxins A, B, and C to rabbit spleen cells. Microbiol Immunol, 1989, 33 (5): 381-390.
  • 9[10]Fleischer B, Schrezenmeier H, Conradt P. T lymphocyte activation by staphylococcal enterotoxins: role of class Ⅱ molecules and T cell surface structures. Cell Immunol, 1989, 120 (1): 92-101.
  • 10[11]Dinges MM, Orwin PM, Schlievert PM. Exotoxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Microbiol Rev, 2000. 13(1):: 16-34.

共引文献72

同被引文献72

引证文献5

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部