期刊文献+

乳糖多管发酵法与酶底物法检测水中大肠埃希菌结果比较 被引量:4

Comparison of results of lactose multiple tube fermentation method and enzyme substrate method in detection of Escherichia coli
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的为检测饮用水中大肠埃希菌选用一种准确、快速、简便的检测方法。方法按生活饮用水标准检验方法(GB/T5750-2006)中乳糖多管发酵法和酶底物法测定水中大肠埃希菌,比较两法的适用性、灵敏度、检测结果的差异。结果乳糖多管发酵法和酶底物法均能检出大肠埃希菌,二法适用性无差异;乳糖多管发酵法灵敏度为10cfu/100m L,底物酶法灵敏度为1cfu/100m L,对40份水样进行检测,乳糖多管发酵法检测周期为72h,检出大肠埃希菌33份,检出率为82.5%(33/40);酶底物法检测周期为24h,检出大肠埃希菌36份,检出率为90.0%(36/40);二法检出率差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.9486,P=0.3301)。二法均检出大肠埃希菌33份,检出符合率为91.67%(33/36),二法均未检出大肠埃希菌5份,未检出符合率为100%(4/4),二法检测效果差异无统计学意义(配对χ2=1.3333,P=0.2482);二法检测结果,差异无统计学意义(配对t=0.5295,P=0.5994)。结论乳糖多管发酵法和酶底物法均可检测饮用水中大肠埃希菌,酶底物法灵敏度高于乳糖多管发酵法,检测时间比乳糖多管发酵法缩短48h。采用酶底物法检测水中大肠埃希菌,能更快捷、准确的报告检测结果。 Objective To select an accurate、fast and convenient method for detection of Escherichia coli in drinkingwater. Methods Escherichia coli in drinking water was detected using lactose multiple tube fermentation method andenzyme substrate method introduced in the standard methods for inspection of drinking water(GB5750- 2006), theapplicability, sensitivity and the difference of the two methods were compared. Results Escherichia coli could be detectedboth by the lactose multiple tube fermentation method and the enzyme substrate method and without differences in terms ofapplicability. The sensitivity of lactose multiple tube fermentation method and substrate enzyme method were 10cfu/100 m L and1cfu/100 m L. In detection of 40 water samples the positive rate of lactose multiple tube fermentation method 82.5%(30/40) for aduration of seventy-two hours, while the positive rate of enzyme substrate method was 90.0%(36/40)for a duration of twentyfour hours, without significant difference(χ^2=0.9486,P=0.3301). Escherichia coli was detected in thirty-three water sampleswith both methods with the coincidence rate of 91.67%(33/36). No Escherichia coli was detected in five samples with bothmethods with the negative coincidence rate of 100%(4/4), therefore, there is no significant difference in the effect and results ofdetection of Escherichia coli between two methods(χ^2=1.3333,P=0.2482)and(t =0.5295,P=0.5994).Conclusion Lactosemultiple tube fermentation method and the enzyme substrate method can both used for detection of Escherichia coli in thedrinking water, but the sensitivity of enzyme substrate method is higher than the lactose multiple tube fermentation method asthe duration of detection time of the latter 48 hours less than the former, thus it allows rapid detection and accurate reporting ofthe results.
出处 《中国热带医学》 CAS 2015年第2期173-175,共3页 China Tropical Medicine
关键词 大肠埃希菌 乳糖多管发酵法 酶底物法 检测 Eschezichia coli Lactose multiple tube fermentation method(LMTFM) Enzyme substrate method(ESM) Detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献13

  • 1苏德模,徐维洁,许华玉,特玉香,刘鹏.MUG-EMB快速检定大肠杆菌的方法研究[J].卫生研究,1994,23(6):343-347. 被引量:2
  • 2GB/T5750-2006.生活饮用水卫生标准[S].
  • 3Conway, P.L. 1995. Microbial ecology of the human large intestine. In: G.R. Gibson and G.T. Macfarlane, eds. p. 1 -24. Human colonic bacteria: role in nutrition, physiology, and pathology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
  • 4American Public Health Association. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed. APHA, Washington, DC.
  • 5中华人民共和国卫生部.GB/T5750.12-2006生活饮用水标准检验方法.微生物指标[S].2006.
  • 6Michael P D, Marilyn C E. The fecal coliform assay, the results of which have led to numerous misinterpretations over the years, may have outlived its usefulness [J]. Am Soc Microbiol,2006,32 : 123 - 126.
  • 7Garcia A T, Prats J, Servais P. Comparison of eulturable fecal coliform and E. coli enumeration in freshwaters[J]. Can J Microbiol,2007 ,53 :798 - 801.
  • 8陈汝仪,许杏春.一例亚利桑那沙门菌引起化脓性脑膜炎的报道[J].临床检脸杂志,1992,10(3):116.
  • 9夏春.间接荧光抗体法快速检测中国淡水鱼主要病原菌[J].中国兽医学报,1998,18(5):466-468. 被引量:7
  • 10丁程成.欧美水质大肠菌群相关检验标准探究[J].环境科技,2010,23(1):67-69. 被引量:8

共引文献18

同被引文献30

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部