期刊文献+

不同招募途径的男男性行为人群梅毒感染状况及影响因素分析 被引量:14

Syphilis infection and its high risk factors among men who have sex with men by different recruitment channels
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解不同招募途径的男男性行为人群(MSM)的梅毒感染状况及影响因素。方法2011年7—12月,对中国卫生部一盖茨基金会艾滋病防治合作项目地区的14个城市(北京、上海、天津、重庆、哈尔滨、沈阳、青岛、西安、南京、武汉、杭州、长沙、昆明、广州)及海南省的MSM进行招募。当地社区组织通过不同途径对MSM进行干预及动员检测,通过匿名问卷收集调查对象的一般人口学资料及性行为相关信息等,收集静脉血进行梅毒螺旋体检测。共招募MSM34100名,其中32701名接受梅毒检测。对不同招募途径的人口学特征、性行为特征及梅毒螺旋体检测情况采用×。检验,对梅毒感染影响因素分析采用单、多因素logistic回归分析。结果32701名MSM的年龄为(30.96_+9.57)岁,包括浴池组2284名(7.0%)、酒吧组4774名(14.6%)、网络组6266名(19.2%)、公园/公厕组1997名(6.1%)和其他组17380名(53.1%)。浴池组梅毒感染率(12.4%,282/2284)明显高于其余4组『酒吧组:4.5%(216/4774);网络组:6.7%(422/6266);公园/公厕组:8.3%(166/1997);其他组:6.4%(1103/17380)](x2=164.58,P〈0.001)。多因素logistic回归结果显示,年龄较大、近3个月男性性伴数在2人以上者【8.O%(1408/17714);0R(95%C1):1.44(1.04~1.98)]、最近3个月未与女性发生性行为者[6.8%(1446/21276);0R(95%C1):1.25(1.07~1.46)]、最近1次性行为未使用安全套[8.0%(769/9668);OR(95% CI):1.13(1.03~1.25)]梅毒感染风险较高;婚姻状态为已婚[7.2%(456/6305);OR(95%CI):0.84(0.73~0.98)];文化程度在大专以上者[5.3%(829/15684);OR(95%CI):0.60(0.53—0.67)1梅毒感染风险较小,现住址为本市和本省[本市:6.5%(1843/28185),OR(95%CX):0.73(0.61~0.87);本省:6.6%(170/2593),0R(95%C1):0.67(0.53—0.85)]与外省调查对象[9.5%(158/1653)]相比梅毒感染率低。结论浴池组梅毒感染率较高,其年龄偏大、文化程度较低且易发生高危性行为,应重点加强浴池场所干预。 Objective To understand the syphilis infection and its high risk factors among men who have sex with men(MSM) recruited from different channels. Methods Supported by the China-Gates Foundation HIV program from July to December 2011, we cooperated with community based organizations to conduct syphilis testing intervention among MSM from 14 cities(Beijing, Shanghai, Tianjin, Chongqing, Harbin, Shenyang, Qingdao, Xi'an, Nanjing, Wuhan, Hangzhou,Changsha, Kunming, and Guangzhou) and one province(Hainan province).Participants were recruited from different channels by the staff of local CBOs, Demographic(e.g. age, marital status, and education) and behavioral(e.g, condom use and sexual partners) data were collected using anonymous questionnaires. Blood samples were also collected to test for syphilis. A total of 34 100 MSM participated in the survey. Participants were excluded from data analysis(1 399, 4.1%) if they did not receive syphilis tests or they completed less than 80.00% of the key questions in the survey. Chi-square tests were used to understand the socio-demographic and behavioral differences between each group. Results of syphilis tests were also compared. Logistic regression models were used to test the statistical significance of these differences.Results A total of 32 701 MSM were enrolled and received syphilis testing. The average age of participates was 30.96±9.57. And among them, 2 284 cases (7.0%) were recruited from gay bathhouses, 4 774 (14.6%)from gay bars, 6 266 (19.2%)from the interuet,1 997 (6.1%) from the parks/toilets and 17 380(53.1%) from other channels.MSM recruited from the bathhouses had the highest syphilis infection rate than other 4 groups: gaybars (4.5%, 216/4 774),internet (6.7%, 422/6 266), parks/toilets (8.3%, 166/1 997),other channels (6.4%, 1 103/17 380) (X2=164.58, P〈0.001 ).The muhivariate logistic regression analysis showed that being〉20 years of age(P〈0.001),having more than 2 homosexual partners in recent 3 months(8.0%(1 408/17 714),0R(95%C1):1.44(1.04-1.98)), having no sex with females in past 3 months(6.8%(1 446/21 276),0R(95%CI): 1.25(1.07-1.46)), and not using condom at last anal sex(8.0% (769/9 668),0R(95%CI):1.13(1.03-1.25)) were associated with a higher probability of being infected with syphilis. Whereas MSM married(7.2%(456/6 305),0R(95%CI):0.84(0.73-0.98)), having a college or a higher education (5.3% (829/15 684),OR(95% CI):0.60(0.53-0.67)),being local residents (6.5% (1 843/28 185),OR (95%CI):0.73(0.61-0.87)) and living in the local province of project cities(6.6%(170/2 593),0R(95%CI):0.67 (0.53-0.85)) were protective factors.Conclusion MSM who were recruited from gay bathhouses have a higher rate of syphilis infection than those in channels relatively. They are older, with low education levels and high-risk sexual behaviors. Tailored interventions are required in the future, especially for MSM from gay bathhouses.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期399-404,共6页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 中国卫生部-盖茨基金会艾滋病防治合作项目(49277)
关键词 梅毒 同性恋 男性 因素分析 统计学 横断面研究 Syphilis Homosexuality, male Factor analysis, statistical Cross-sectional studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

二级参考文献66

共引文献108

同被引文献121

  • 1杨介者,潘晓红,马瞧勤,徐云,陈琳,王憓.男男性行为人群安全套使用及影响因素分析[J].浙江预防医学,2013,25(5):9-12. 被引量:26
  • 2羊海涛,丁建平,陈国红,李秀芳,张北川,管文辉.江苏省部分城市男男性接触者行为学特征分析[J].江苏预防医学,2006,17(1):1-4. 被引量:21
  • 3吕繁,赵金扣,蒋岩,肖瑶,张伟东.BED HIV-1发病监测方法及其应用[J].中国艾滋病性病,2006,12(2):179-181. 被引量:42
  • 4中华人民共和国国务院.国务院关于进一步加强艾滋病防治工作的通知[EB/OL].(2010-12-31)[2014-02-14].http://www.gov.en/zwgk/2011-02/16/content1804536.htm.
  • 5Wu Z,Xu J, Liu E, et al, HIV and syphilis prevalence among men who have sex with men: a cross-sectional survey of 61 cities in China. Clin Infect Dis,2013,57:298-309.
  • 6Tsui HY,Lau JTF Comparison of risk behaviors and sociocultural profile of men who have sex with men survey respondents recruited via venues and the intemet [J].BMC Public Health, 2010,10:232.
  • 7Galvin SR, Cohen MS. The role of sexually transmitted diseases in HIV transmission. Nat Rev Microbiol,200g ,2 :33-42.
  • 8UNAIDS. 90-90-90:An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic[EB/OL]. [2016-01-30]. http://www.unaids. org/sites/default/files/media_asset/90-90-90_en_0.pdf.
  • 9刘嘉,肖金玲.北京市海淀区温泉镇社区居民艾滋病知识知晓率调查结果分析[J].2015,22(z1):176-177.
  • 10Zhang Y, Kim JA, Liu F, et al. Creative Contributory Contests to Spur Innovation in Sexual Health: 2 Cases and a Guide for Implementation[J].Sex Transm Dis, 2015, 42(11):625-628. DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000349.

引证文献14

二级引证文献55

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部