期刊文献+

新生代员工的工作动力机制及组织激励错位对创造力的抑制 被引量:24

Working Dynamic Mechanism of New-generation Employees and Inhibiting Effect of Organizational Dislocated Incentives on Creativity
原文传递
导出
摘要 激活内在动机是提升员工创造力的关键所在。本文系统研究了本土新生代员工的工作动力机制以及现有组织激励体系是否与其工作价值需求匹配。结果表明:(1)总体而言,本土员工的工作动力表现为外在动机驱使,跨样本比较显示,内在动机远弱于美国员工,Kruskal-Wallis秩和检验显示,内在动机随代际年龄增加呈下降趋势,新生代员工的内在工作动机最强;(2)Wilcoxon检验显示,组织激励体系明显滞后于新生代员工的工作价值需求,错位激励引发了动机偏转;(3)进一步的多项式回归与响应面分析显示,组织激励供给与新生代员工工作价值需求匹配时,能够显著提升创造力,背离则抑制创造力。本文揭示,错位激励导致的内在动机偏转,在某种程度上应为我国创造力缺失买单,改革薪酬激励模式和塑造软性激励环境,必须提到企业的重要战略议程。 Many post-80 s and post-90 s employees grew up in the era background of two-tier vicissitude in Chinese economic structure and family structure.Big data baptism and multi cultural integration have profoundly shaped the temperament and value pursuit of the new-generation employees what are different from their predecessors.Considering the special ages of value formation and urgency of enterprise innovation and transitional development,the research on the work value needs of the new-generation employees and the exploration of internal impetus mechanism which actuate and motivate them to carry out the work creatively have great theoretical value and practical significance.According to self-determination theory which was initially proposed by Deci and Ryan,social context factors(eg,compensation incentives)influence the consequences of individual behavior(eg,creativity)generally by satisfying individual work value needs what can affect the motivations of individual behavior.All these entirely constitute dynamic mechanism of employees' work.A large amount of researches on the relation of intrinsic motivation and perceived work value have proven that satisfaction with employees' work value needs by organizational supply was the internal transmission mechanism and effective path which could activate intrinsic motivation and promote creativity.Thus,the researchers should examine whether the reward system for employees by organization(eg,compensation incentives) satisfied or fitted employees' work value needs.However,there appears to be no consensus on whether reward can effectively drive employees' work behaviors and improve employees' creativity in the workplace.Romanticism represented by Deci,based on self-determination theory,considered human life as a pursuit of self-actualization.And they argued that reward,which were perceived as controlling,could undermine individual perceptions of self-determination,generate "hidden costs of dominate incentives",and lead to an elimination or deviation in internal achievement motivation and creativity.In contrast,utilitarianism represented by Eisenberger,based on learned industriousness theory,revealed that reward for positive effort involving one or more work tasks promote the subsequent effort exerted in new tasks.And their studies have showed that reward effectively increases perceived self-determination of dealing with the anfractuous situation,enhances intrinsic motivation,and improves employees' creativity.This paper systematic studied working dynamic mechanism of local new-generation employees,and whether existing incentive system matches employees' work value needs.The result shows that local employees' work is driven by extrinsic motivation generally;and the result of cross sample comparison shows that local employees' intrinsic motivation is much weaker than the American employees'.Kruskal-Wallis test shows that intrinsic motivation has trended down with the increase of age and generation,and it of new-generation employees is strongest.Wilcoxon test shows that organizational incentive system is obviously falling behind work value needs of new-generation employees.It means that dislocated incentives trigger the deviation of intrinsic motivation.Further polynomial regression and response surface analysis shows that when the incentive system matches individual intrinsic motivation,creativity will be enhanced significantly;otherwise,it will be inhibited.This paper reveals that the deviation in intrinsic motivation,caused by dislocated incentives,have to pay for the lack of Chinese creativity to some extent.Chinese enterprises should change their inertial business thought the strong will be strong forever,and innovate performance evaluation and compensation incentives system.
出处 《经济管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期74-84,共11页 Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )
基金 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"自我管理团队的协和控制 成就目标导向对成员创造力影响机制的跨层次研究"(10YJC630178) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题项目"研发人员绩效工资的心理计量机制及其对创造力的非线性影响:来自张江高科技园区的证据"(2013BGL015)
关键词 新生代员工 内在动机 工作价值感知 奖励价值感知 错位激励 创造力 new-generation employees intrinsic motivation perceived work value perceived reward value dislocated incentives creativity
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions [ M ]. Sage Publications, 1991.
  • 2Amabile T M ,Julianna P. Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity [ J ]. Journal of Creative Behavior,2012, ( 1 ) : 3 -15.
  • 3Amabile T M. The Social Psychology of Creativity: A Componential Conceptualization [ J ]. Leadership Quarterly, 1983, ( 2 ) : 357 - 376.
  • 4Brown M P, Sturman M C, Simmering M J. Compensation Policy and Organizational Performance : The efficiency, Operational, and Financial Implications of Pay Levels and Pay Structure [J]. Academy of Management Journal,2003, (6) :752 -762.
  • 5Cheung, G. W. , Rensvold, R. B. Evaluating Goodness-of-fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance [ J ]. Structural Equa- tion Modeling,2002, (2) :235 - 255.
  • 6Cohen A, Nahum-Shani I, Doveh E. Further Insight and Additional Inference Methods for Polynomial Regression Applied to the Analysis of Congruence [ J ]. Multivariate Behavioral Research ,2010, (5) :828 -852.
  • 7Deci E L, Koestner R, Ryan R M. A meta-analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on In- trinsic motivation [ J ]. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, (6) : 627 - 668.
  • 8Deci E L, Ryan R M. Handbook of Self-determination research [ M]. University of Rochester Press ,2002.
  • 9De Dreu C K W, Nijstad B A , Bechtoldt M N, Baas M. Group Creativity and Innovation : A Motivated Information Processing perspective [ J ]. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts ,2011, (1) :81 -89.
  • 10Drazin R, Glynn M A, Kazanjian R K. Multilevel Theorizing about Creativity in Organizations: A Sensemaking Perspective [ J ]. Academy of Management Review, 1999, (2) :286 - 307.

二级参考文献36

  • 1马剑虹,倪陈明.企业职工的工作价值观特征分析[J].应用心理学,1998,4(1):10-14. 被引量:38
  • 2金盛华,李雪.大学生职业价值观:手段与目的[J].心理学报,2005,37(5):650-657. 被引量:230
  • 3李超平,时勘.变革型领导的结构与测量[J].心理学报,2005,37(6):803-811. 被引量:452
  • 4杜建政,张翔,赵燕.核心自我评价:人格倾向研究的新取向[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(1):116-121. 被引量:54
  • 5Amabile T M, Barsade S G, Mueller J S and Staw B M. Affect and creativity at work[J]. Administrative Science Quarter- ly,2005,50(3) 367--403.
  • 6Anderson N,Poto6nik K and Zhou J. Innovation and creativity in organizations a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework[J ]. Journal of Management, 2014,40 (5) : 1297 -- 1333.
  • 7Baas M, Roskes M, Sligte D, Nijstad B A and De Dreu C K W. Personality and creativity: The dual pathway to creativity model and a research agenda[J]. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2013,7 (10) : 732-- 748.
  • 8Bowles S and Polania-Reyes S. Economic incentives and social preferences: Substitutes or complements? [J]. Journal of Economic Literature,2012,50(2) : 368--425.
  • 9De Dreu C K W,Nijstad B A and Van Knippenberg D. Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making[J]. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2008,12(1): 22--49.
  • 10De Dreu C K W,Nijstad B A and Baas M. Behavioral activation links to creativity because of increased cognitive flexibility [J]. Social Psychological and Personality Science,2011a,2(1): 7--80.

共引文献193

同被引文献247

引证文献24

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部