期刊文献+

自升式钻井平台筒型桩靴试验研究 被引量:2

A Comparison of the Penetration Behavior of Spudcan and Caisson Foundations of Jack-up Drilling Platform
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了比较自升式钻井平台筒型桩靴和传统桩靴在插桩过程中的力学性能,在相同截面积和插桩深度条件下分别对2种桩靴模型在饱和粘土和砂土中进行了插桩模拟试验。试验结果表明,在粘土中,筒型桩靴和传统桩靴的插桩阻力均随插桩深度的增加而增大,且插桩阻力最大值相近;在砂土中,筒型桩靴插桩阻力最大值是传统桩靴的0.62倍;筒型桩靴模型在砂土中插桩阻力最大值是在粘土中的4.11倍;传统桩靴在砂土中插桩阻力最大值是在粘土中的6.76倍。该研究结果可为海洋工程实际应用提供参考。 In order to comparatively analyze the mechanical properties of penetration process of spudcan and traditional caisson foundation of jack-up drilling platform, penetration test is been conducted in the saturated clay and sand with the two kinds of foundations with the same cross-sectional area and the penetration depth. The results show that, in clay, both the penetration resistances of the spudcan and the traditional caisson foundation increase with the increase of penetration depth, and the maximum resistances are similar. In sand, the maximum resistance of the spudcan foundation is 0. 62 times of the traditional caisson foundation. For the spudcan, the maximum penetration resistance in sand is 4. 11 times than in clay. For the traditional caisson, the maximum penetration resistance in sand is 6. 76 times than in clay. The study results could provide references for marine engineering practice.
出处 《石油机械》 2015年第5期67-71,共5页 China Petroleum Machinery
基金 中海油田服务股份有限公司科研项目"吸力锚设计计算及软件开发"(G1417CS-B12C041)
关键词 自升式钻井平台 筒型桩靴 传统桩靴 插桩阻力 插桩试验 jack-up drilling platform inverted conical spudcan traditional caisson penetration resistance penetration test
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1王志云,王忠涛,栾茂田,王栋.吸力式沉箱基础极限拉拔承载力的数值分析[J].岩土力学,2008,29(6):1545-1550. 被引量:10
  • 2Gottardi G, Houlsby G T, Butteffield 1 The plastic re- sponse of circular footings on sand under general planar loading [J] .Geotechnique, I999, 49 (4): 453- 470.
  • 3Martin C M, Houlsby G T. Combined loading of spud- can foundations on clay: Laboratory tests [J]. Geoteehnique, 2000, 50 (4): 325-338.
  • 4Byrne B W. Investigations of suction caissons in dense sand [ D] . Oxford city: University of Oxford, 2000.
  • 5Wardrop J. Comparative analysis of suction caissons and spudoan, in the context of jack-ups on calcareous silt [ D ] . Australia: The University of Western Australia,2000.
  • 6Cassidy M J, Byme B W, Randolph M F. A compari- son of tthe combined load behaviour of spudcan and cais- son foundation on soft normally consolidated clay [ J ] . Geotechnique, 2000, 54 (2): 91-106.
  • 7Vlahos G. Physical and numerical modelling of a three- legged jack-up structure on clay soil [ D] . Australia: The University of Western Australia, 2000.
  • 8张浦阳,丁红岩.海上自升式钻井平台新型筒型桩靴承载力[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(2):237-242. 被引量:14

二级参考文献30

  • 1栾茂田,林皋,郭莹.土体稳定分析的改进滑楔模型及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,1995,17(4):1-9. 被引量:11
  • 2Tan F S. Centrifuge and theoretical modeling of conical footings on sand [D]. Cambridge: University of Cambridge, 1990.
  • 3Gourvenec S, Randolph M. Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay [J]. Geotechnique, 2003, 53(6) : 575-586.
  • 4Supachawarote C, Randolph M, Gourvenec S. Inclined pull-out capacity of suction caissons [C]//The International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers. Proceedings of the 14th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference. Toulon: The Society of lOPE, 2004.
  • 5Senders M, Kay S. Geotechnical suction pile anchor design in deep water soft clays [C]//The Society of DRMA. Proceedings of Deepwater Risers Mooring and Anchoring Conference. London: The Society of DRMA, 2002.
  • 6Bransby M F. Failure envelopes and plastic potentials for eccentrically loaded surface footings on undrained soil [ J ]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, 2001, 25: 329-346.
  • 7Green A P. The plastic yielding of metal junctions due to combined shear and pressure [J]. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 1954, 2(3): 197 211.
  • 8Bransby M F, Randolph M F. Combined loading of skirted foundations[J]. Geotechnique, 1998, 48(5): 637-655.
  • 9Taiebat H, Carter J P. Numerical studies of the bearing capacity of shallow footings on cohesive soil subjected to combined loading [J]. Geotechnique, 2000, 50(4): 409-418.
  • 10Martin C M. Physical and numerical modeling of offshore foundations under combined loads [D]. Oxford: University of Oxford, 1994.

共引文献22

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部