期刊文献+

儿童青少年协作促进的发展

The Development of Children and Young People's Collaborative Facilitation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 旨在考察不同年龄的个体,在不同回忆序列和学习材料上协作促进的发展情况。采用3(回忆序列:协作—个人—个人〔CII〕、个人—协作—个人〔ICI〕、个人—个人—个人〔III〕)×5(年龄:9、11、14、17、20)×2(材料:图片、文字)的被试间设计。结果发现:(1)各年龄个体在CII和ICI两种回忆序列上均出现了协作促进,且两种序列条件下被试的最终个人回忆成绩无差异;(2)另外,17岁个体的协作促进量显著高于9岁、11岁、14岁和20岁,其他各年龄之间无差异;(3)图片和文字的协作促进量无差异。这说明小组协作回忆的顺序对协作促进没有太大影响,17岁个体协作促进的效果最好。 This research explored the development of individuals' collaborative facilitation of different ages in different retrieve sequences and learning materials. The design was a 5 (age: 9 years old, 11 years old, 14 years old, 17 years old and 20 years old) × 3 (recall sequence: CII. ICI,III) × 2 (learning materials: pictures or texts) between-subjects design. The results showed that collaborative facilitation appeared in all ages of both CII andlCl recall sequences, and the final memory performance in these two sequences had no difference. What's more, the amount of collaborative facilitation of 17 years old participants was higher than 9, 11, 14 and 20 years old. There was no difference among other age. No matter how old the participant was, there was no difference between picture and texts on the collaborative facilitation amount. These suggest that the order of collaborative memory has little impact on collaborative facilitation. The effects of collaborative facilitation in 17-year-old individuals are the best.
出处 《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期296-302,共7页 Psychological Development and Education
基金 教育部人文社科研究基金项目(14YJA190007) 天津市哲学社科规划重点课题(TJJX13-002) 天津市十二五教育科学规划重点课题(CE2016) 天津市高等学校创新团队培养计划
关键词 协作促进 回忆序列 图片优势效应 儿童青少年 Collaborative Facilitation Recall Sequence Picture Superiority Effect Children and Young people
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Andersson, J. (2001). Net effect of memory collaboration: How is collaboration affected by factors such as friendship, gender and age? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 42, 367 - 375.
  • 2Barber, S. J., & Rajaram, S. (2011). Exploring the relationship between retrieval disruption from collaboration and recall. Memory, 19, 462 - 469.
  • 3Barber, S. J. , Rajaram, S. , & Aron, A. (2010). When two is too many: Collaborative encoding impairs memory. Memory & Cognition 38, 255 - 264.
  • 4Basden, B. H. , Basden, D. R. , Bryner, S. , & Thomas III, R. L. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23, 1176 - 1189.
  • 5Basden, B. H. , Basden, D. R. , & Henry, S. (2000). Costs and promotion of collaborative remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 497 -507.
  • 6Blumen, H. M. (2010). Short-term and long-term collaboration promotion on individual recall in younger and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 100, 739 - 742.
  • 7Blumen, It. M. , & Rajaram, S. (2008). Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall. Memory, 16, 231 - 244.
  • 8Blumen, H. M., & Rajaram, S. (2009). Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks. Memory, 17, 840- 846.
  • 9Congleton A, Rajaram S. (2011). The influence of learning methods on collaboration: Prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140,535 -551.
  • 10Finlay, F., Hitch, G. J., & Meudell, P. R. (2000). Mutual inhibition in collaborative recall: Evidence for a retrieval-based account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 26, 1556 - 1567.

二级参考文献83

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部