期刊文献+

2种质子泵抑制剂预防冠脉支架术后消化道出血的最小成本分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the Cost-minimization of 2 Kinds of Proton Pump Inhibitors in the Prevention of Patients with Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Coronary Stenting
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价两种质子泵抑制剂预防冠脉支架术后消化道出血的经济学效果。方法:收集2013年3月-2014年2月某院心血管内科急性冠脉综合征支架术后患者141例,按所选质子泵抑制剂不同分为泮托拉唑组(71例)和雷贝拉唑组(70例)。两组在常规治疗基础上分别使用泮托拉唑(40 mg/d,po,qd)和雷贝拉唑(20 mg/d,po,qd),疗程为4~5 d。观察两种治疗方案开始用药后2周内预防患者消化道出血的疗效,以及用药后6个月的心血管不良事件,并进行最小成本分析。结果:泮托拉唑组和雷贝拉唑组的有效率分别为94.37%、92.86%,组间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);血管不良事件发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。两组成本分别为1 537.1、1 859.3元,泮托拉唑组的成本较低。结论:泮托拉唑与雷贝拉唑均可有效预防冠脉支架术后患者的消化道出血事件,但使用泮托拉唑的经济性更好。 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 2 kinds of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) in the prevention of pa- tients with gastrointestinal bleeding after coronary stenting. METHODS: 141 patients with stenting in acute coronary syndrome in the cardiology department of a hospital from Mar. 2013 to Feb. 2014 were collected and divided into pantoprazole group (71 cases) and rabeprazole group (70 cases) by the PPI. Based on the routine treatment, the 2 groups were respectively given pantoprazole (40 mg/d, po, qd) and rabeprazole (20 mg/d, po, qd) as the PPI. The course was about 4-5 days. The clinic data was observed, including the efficacy of 2 regimens in the prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding within 2 weeks and the cardiovascular adverse re- actions (ADR) after 6 months. Cost-minimization analysis was performed. RESULTS: The effective rate of pantoprazole group and rabeprazole group was respectively 94.37% and 92.86%, with no significant difference (P〉0.05) ; there was no significant differ- ence in the incidence of vascular ADR (P〉0.05). The cost in 2 groups was respectively 1 537.1 and 1 859.3 yuan and pantopra- zole group had lower cost. CONCLUSIONS: Both pantoprazole and rabeprazole can effectively prevent the gastrointestinal bleeding of patients after coronary stenting. However, pantoprazole has better economics.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第14期1890-1892,共3页 China Pharmacy
关键词 泮托拉唑 雷贝拉唑 经皮冠状动脉介入治疗 上消化道出血 最小成本分析 Pantoprazole Rabeprazole Percutaneous coronary intervention Upper gastrointestinal bleeding Cost-minimiza- tion analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献88

  • 1李占鲁,周斌全,朱军慧,傅国胜.质子泵抑制剂和氯吡格雷联用与支架内再狭窄关系的回顾性研究[J].浙江大学学报(医学版),2011,40(6):667-672. 被引量:7
  • 2韩雅玲,王耿,荆全民,王守力,王祖禄,王冬梅,马颖艳,栾波.急性冠状动脉综合征介入治疗4670例近期疗效的评价[J].中华医学杂志,2005,85(15):1040-1044. 被引量:47
  • 3沈爱宗,张善堂,史天陆,屈建,陈礼明,陈飞虎.国内药物经济学文献计量学分析[J].药物流行病学杂志,2005,14(3):167-169. 被引量:8
  • 4王鋆,张钧.药物经济学成本-效果分析[J].药学实践杂志,1995,13(4):193-197. 被引量:462
  • 5Sibbing D, Morath T, Stegherr J, et al. hnpact of proton pump inhibitors on the antiplatelet effects of clopidogret[J]. Thromb Haemost, 2009, 101(4) : 714-719.
  • 6Juurlink D N, Comes T, Ko D T, et al. A population-based study of the drug interaction between proton pump inhibitors and clopidogrel[J]. CMAJ, 2009, 180(7): 713-718.
  • 7Ho P M, Maddox T M, Wang L, et al. Risk of adverse outcomes associated with concomitant use of clopidogrel and proton pump inhibitors following acute coronary syndrome [ J]. JAMA, 2009, 301(9): 937-944.
  • 8Mehta S R, Yusuf S, Peters R J, et al. Effects of pretreatment with clopidogrel and aspirin followed by long-term therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the PCI-CURE study[J]. Lancet, 2001, 358(9281): 527- 533.
  • 9Derry S, Loke Y K. Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis [ J], BMJ, 2000, 321(7270) : 1183-1187.
  • 10Calderon Hemanz B, Pinteno Blanco M, Puigventos Lotorre F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of combining clopidogrel and proton ptunp inhibitors[J]. Farm Hosp, 2009, 33(6) : 338-339.

共引文献127

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部