期刊文献+

老年人行为决策:领域现状与挑战 被引量:15

The Elderly Decision Making: The Current Situations and Challenges of the Field
下载PDF
导出
摘要 老年人的决策特点在多个领域各有不同,具体表现为消费领域的信息搜索数量下降,风险决策中的风险规避倾向,医疗决策中对框架效应敏感性的下降以及日常决策中存在经验优势等。总的来说,老年人在一部分决策任务中表现较差,而在另一部分决策任务中表现与年轻人无差异甚至优于年轻人。老年人的决策效度主要受到个体认知、情绪和任务特征等因素的交互影响,遵循个体-情境拟合理论。未来研究除了要继续探讨老年决策者在不同领域决策任务下的表现及影响因素,并深入解决决策质量及策略等方面争议外,还应进一步加强对被试特征、决策策略、跨文化等一系列变量及认知神经机制的研究。 Decision making in elderly people can be characterized in different areas by the following features: limitation of predecisional information search in consumer decision, risk-avoiding in risky choice situations, diminished sensitivity to the framing effect in medical decision-making, and some advantage based on richer relevant experience in everyday problem-solving. In general, for some decision-making tasks, older adults perform worse than younger adults, whereas they do better or at least as well as younger adults in some other tasks. The validity of elderly decision-making is mainly influenced by the interaction of cognitive aspects, emotional factors and task characteristics, and is in agreement with the person–context fit framework. For future studies, in addition to further clarification of the characteristics of decision makers’ performance in different areas and solving current issues about decision qualities and strategies, we should also pay more attention to the influence of variables related to individual characteristics, decision-making strategies, and cross-cultural factors. Further research on cognitive and neural mechanisms should be strengthened.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期858-870,共13页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(31200778) 教育部人文社科项目(青年基金)(12YJC190039) 中国博士后科学基金特别资助(201104168)
关键词 老年人 行为决策 决策领域 个人特征 任务情境 elderly decision making decision making area, individual characteristics contextual
  • 相关文献

参考文献77

  • 1陈慧,车宏生,朱敏.跨文化适应影响因素研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(6):704-710. 被引量:230
  • 2吴燕,周晓林,罗跃嘉.跨期选择和风险决策的认知神经机制[J].心理与行为研究,2010,8(1):76-80. 被引量:6
  • 3于窈,李纾.“过分自信”的研究及其跨文化差异[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(3):468-474. 被引量:25
  • 4Agarwal, S., & Mazumder, B. (2013). Cognitive abilities and household financial decision making. American Economic Journal." Applied Economics, 5(1), 193-207.
  • 5Bauer, A. S., Timpe, J. C., Edmonds, E. C., Bechara, A., Tranel,D., & Denburg, N. L. (2013). Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Age-related changes in decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task. Emotion, 13(1), 19-24.
  • 6Bellante, D., & Green, C. A. (2004). Relative risk aversion among the elderly. Review of Financial Economics, 13(3), 269-281.
  • 7Blanchard-Fields, F. (2007). Everyday problem solving and emotion: An adult developmental perspective. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(1), 26-31.
  • 8Blanchard-Fields, F., Mienaltowski, A., & Seay, R. B. (2007) Age differences in everyday problem-solving effectiveness: Older adults select more effective strategies for interpersonal problems. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 62(1), P61 464.
  • 9Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 92(5), 938-956.
  • 10Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A. M., & Fischhoff, B. (2012). Explaining adult age differences in decision-making competence. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(4), 352-360.

二级参考文献80

  • 1Von Neumann J, Morgonstem O. Thoery of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, 1947.
  • 2Camerer C, Loewenstein G, Drazen P. Neuroecomonics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 2005, 43:9-64.
  • 3Kenning P, Plassmann H. Neuroecomonics: An overview from an economic perspective. Brain Research Bulletin, 2005, 67:343-354.
  • 4Melers B A, Schwartz R I. Emotion-based choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1999, 128:332-345.
  • 5Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: an alternative of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 1982, 92:805-824.
  • 6Loomes G, Sugden R. Disappointment and dynamic consistency in choice under uncertainty. Review of Economic Studies. 1986, 53:271-282.
  • 7Loewenstein G, Weber E, Hsee C, et al. Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 2001, 127 (2) : 267-286.
  • 8Bechara A, Antonio R, Damasio H. The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 2005, 52:336-372.
  • 9Zajonc R B. Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inference. American Psychologist, 1980, 35:151-175.
  • 10Zajonc R. Emotions. The Handbook of Social Psychology. New York Oxford University Press, 1998. 591-632.

共引文献258

同被引文献161

引证文献15

二级引证文献72

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部