期刊文献+

公平的神经基础 被引量:4

Neural basis of fairness
原文传递
导出
摘要 公平问题是人类长久以来的话题,研究已经证实人们存在着公平偏好。关于公平的神经基础,研究者采用脑功能成像技术进行了深入探索,并提示了其在精神疾病研究中的应用价值。本文介绍研究公平行为的博弈实验范式——最后通牒博弈,概述基于最后通牒博弈的神经影像学研究发现。从分配额度、得失情境、框架效应、群体意见、社会地位及情绪几个方面,综述影响公平行为的因素及其神经基础。在临床研究方面,列举了有关抑郁症、精神病态患者及反社会青少年的公平行为及其神经基础的相关研究。分析表明,未来研究应注意从脑网络的角度对公平行为的神经基础进行探讨,考虑到具体的社会情境对公平行为的影响,加强博弈实验范式在神经精神疾病中的应用,并深入探索公平感知的神经计算模型。 Fairness is an essential ingredient in human society. Numerous studies have confirmed that people have fairness preference. With regard to the neural basis of fairness, researchers are focusing on the issue of neural mechanism that underlies fair behavior using neuroimaging techniques, and suggest a possibility to transfer the findings in the neural basis of fairness into clinical applications. In this paper, we fimt introduce a game theory-based paradigm for investigating fairness--the ultimatum game, and then review neuroimaging studies based on this game. In addition, we address the factors that may influence fairness and their neural mechanisms, namely, stake size, gain-loss contexts, framing effect, group opinion, social status, and emotion. We also summarize the studies that use the ultimatum game to investigate the clinical population, such as major depressive disorder, psychopathy, and antisocial adolescents. Meanwhile, we propose the followings: the neural mechanism of fairness should be examined from the perspective of brain networks, the influence of specific social contexts on fair behavior should be eonsidered, the applieation of game theory paradigms in neuropsychiatric disorders should be strengthened, and the models of neural eomputation underlying fairness should be explored more deeply in future studies. Finally, we briefly introduce some Chinese researchers that are representative in this area.
出处 《科技导报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第9期83-92,共10页 Science & Technology Review
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(2011CB711000) 国家自然科学基金项目(81371476) 北京市科技新星计划项目(Z121107002512064) 北京市优秀博士学位论文指导教师人文社科项目(20138012501)
关键词 公平 最后通牒博弈 神经基础 功能性磁共振 fairness ultimatum game neural basis fMRI
  • 相关文献

参考文献105

  • 1Falk A, Fehr E, Fischbacher U. On the nature of fair behavior[J]. Economic Inquiry, 2003, 41(1): 20-26.
  • 2Sutter M. Outcomes versus intentions: On the nature of fair behavior and its development with age[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology, 2007, 28(1): 69-78.
  • 3Coleman J S. Foundations of social theory[M]. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.
  • 4梁竹苑,周媛,饶俪琳,等.神经经济学:探索人类决策行为的神经基础[N].中国社会科学报.2010-07-29.
  • 5刘长江,李纾.神经经济学:迈向脑科学的决策科学[J].心理科学,2007,30(2):482-484. 被引量:8
  • 6Gtith W, Schmittberger R, Schwarze B. An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining[J]. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1982, 3(4): 367-388.
  • 7Camerer C. Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction [M]. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 2003.
  • 8Glimcher P, Camerer C, Fehr E, et al. Decision Making and the Brain [M]. London: Academic Press, 2008.
  • 9Brandts J, Sola C. Reference points and negative reciprocity in simple sequential games[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2001, 36(2): 138- 157.
  • 10Guth W, Huck S, Mailer W. The relevance of equal splits in ultimatum games[J]. Games and Economic Behavior, 2001, 37(1): 161-169.

二级参考文献197

  • 1沈厚才,徐进,庞湛.损失规避偏好下的定制件采购决策分析[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(6):37-45. 被引量:44
  • 2史金艳,李凯,郁培丽.考虑损失厌恶的最优消费投资决策[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2005,26(12):1196-1199. 被引量:5
  • 3Ariely, D., Huber, J., & Wertenbroch, K. (2005). When do losses loom larger than gains? Journal of Marketing Research, 42, 134-138.
  • 4Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 113-123.
  • 5Becker, G.M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Science, 9, 226-232.
  • 6Brown, T. C. (2005). Loss aversion without the endowment effect, and other explanations for the WTA-WTP disparity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 57, 367-379.
  • 7Carmon, Z., & Ariely, D. (2000). Focusing on the forgone: how value can appear so different to buyers and sellers. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 360-370.
  • 8Carrnon, Z., Wertenbroch, K., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Option attachment: when deliberating makes choosing feel like losing. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 15-29.
  • 9Chapman, G. B. (1998). Similarity and reluctance to trade. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 11, 47-58.
  • 10Chen, M. K., Lakshminarayanan, V., & Santos, L. R. (2006). How basic are behavioral biases? Evidence from capuchin monkey trading behavior. Journal of Political Economy, 114, 517-537.

共引文献146

同被引文献94

  • 1孟天广.转型期的中国政治信任:实证测量与全貌概览[J].华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2014,53(2):1-10. 被引量:75
  • 2龙立荣,刘亚.组织不公正及其效果研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2004,12(4):584-593. 被引量:59
  • 3谢晓非,孔瑞芬,陈曦,阎学煌.儿童合作倾向与家长价值观[J].心理科学,2000,23(6):699-702. 被引量:17
  • 4王磊,谭晨,寇彧.同伴冲突解决的干预训练对小学儿童合作的影响[J].心理发展与教育,2005,21(4):83-88. 被引量:18
  • 5谢晓非,余媛媛,陈曦,陈晓萍.合作与竞争人格倾向测量[J].心理学报,2006,38(1):116-125. 被引量:72
  • 6Brafias-Garza, P., Espin, A. M., & Neuman, S. (2014). Religious pro-sociality? Experimental evidence from a sample of 766 Spaniards. PLoS ONE, 9(8), e104685.
  • 7BrandstS, tter, H., & KSnigstein, M. (2001). Personality influences on ultimatum bargaining decisions. European Journal of Pemonality, 15(S1), $53-$70.
  • 8Brevers, D., Nol, X., Ermer, E., Dabiri, D., Verhanek, P., & Komreich, C. (2013). Unfairness sensitivity and social decision-making in individuals with alcohol dependence: A preliminary study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 133(2), 772-775.
  • 9Buchan, N. R., Croson, R. T. A., & Johnson, E. J. (2004). When do fair beliefs influence bargaining behavior? Experimental bargaining in Japan and the United States. Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (1), 181 - 190.
  • 10Chew, S. H., Ebstein, R. P., & Zhong, S. F. (2013). Sex-hormone genes and gender difference in ultimatum game: Experimental evidence from China and Israel. Journal of Eeanomlc Behavior and Organization, 90, 28-42.

引证文献4

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部