期刊文献+

中文版尿毒症期腹膜透析患者依从性问卷的开发与研究 被引量:8

Research and development of Chinese version of ESRD-AQ
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的编译修订尿毒症期腹膜透析患者依从性问卷,为测验腹膜透析患者的依从性提供量化工具。方法对英文版的尿毒症期患者依从性问卷进行翻译、回译及文化调适,将问卷中血液透析的条目修订为腹膜透析条目。最后建立中文版尿毒症期腹膜透析患者依从性问卷,主要包括5个部分46个条目。并于2012年9月~2013年10月在沈阳市两所三级甲等医院以84例持续腹膜透析患者为研究对象,采用现场测试法,然后对结果进行信度和效度检验。结果各条目分析中的项目高低分组t检验差异有高度统计学意义(P〈0.01),问卷的内容效度CVI为1.000,重测信度系数ICC为0.945,实测效度较好。结论中文版尿毒症期腹膜透析患者依从性问卷具有较好的稳定性和可靠性,可应用于评估腹膜透析患者的依从性研究,为临床进一步教育和管理腹膜透析患者提供了理论支持。 Objective To compile and revise the end-stage renal disease adherence questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), in order to provide a quantitative tool for testing the compliance of peritoneal dialysis patients. Methods The English version of ESRD-AQ was translated, back-translated, adjusted culture and revised, the hemodialysis was revised to peritoneal dialysis, Chinese version of ESRD-AQ was developed, it included five parts, 46 clauses. And from September 2012 to October 2013, in two Class Ill" Grade [ hospitals of Shenyang City, 84 patients with continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis were seloected and given the field test method, then the results were taken reliability and validity testing. Re stilts T test of the analysis of each item between the project groups had statistically significant differences (P 〈 0.01). The content validity of the questionnaire CVI was 1.000, and retest reliability coefficient ICC was 0.945, and the measurement validity was good. Conclusion The Chinese version of ESRD-AQ is reliable and valid. It can be applied to asses the compliance of peritoneal dialysis patients, and provide theory support for further education and management of peritoneal dialysis patients.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2015年第14期153-157,共5页 China Medical Herald
基金 辽宁省科学技术计划项目(2011225020)
关键词 腹膜透析 依从性 问卷调查 信度 效度 Peritoneal dialysis Compliance Questionnaire Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Kugler C, Maeding I,Russell CL. Non-adherence in pa- tients on chronic hemodialysis: an international compari- son study [J]. JN Ephrol,2011,24(3) :366-375.
  • 2Kim Y, Evangelista LS, Phillips LR, et al. The end-stage renal disease adherence questionnaire (ESRD-AQ) :test- ing the psychometric properties in patients receiving in- center hemodialysis [J]. Nephrol Nurs J, 2010,37 (4) : 377- 393.
  • 3Yen M, Lo L. Examining test-retest reliability--an intra- class correlation approach [J]. Nursing Research,2002, 51(1):59-62.
  • 4杨美荣,杨美芹.健康教育对社区高血压患者依从性的影响研究[J].中国社区医师(医学专业),2011,13(34):253-254. 被引量:24
  • 5Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Focus on research methods. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator ofcontent validity? Ap- praisal and recommendations [J]. Research in Nursing & Health, 2007,30: 459-467.
  • 6Lynn MR.Determination and quantification of content va- lidity [J]. Nursing Research, 1986,35 (6) : 382-385.
  • 7Sabate E. Adherence to long-term therapies:evidence for action [M]. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003.
  • 8Sadala ML, Bruzos GA, Pereira ER, et al. Patients" experi- ences of peritoneal dialysis at home :a phenomenological approach [J]. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem,2012,20(1):68- 75.
  • 9Oliver M J, Garg AX, Blake PG,et al. Impact of contraindi- cations,barriers to self-care and support on incident peritoneal dialysis utilization [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2010,25 : 2737-2744.
  • 10Tomasello S, Dhupar S, Sherman RA. Phosphate binders, K/DOQI guidelines, and compliance :the unfortunate real- ity [J]. Dial Transplant, 2004,33 : 236-242.

二级参考文献6

共引文献28

同被引文献86

引证文献8

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部